We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The product’s availability, ease of configuration, and documentation are valuable."
"The solution is stable."
"The product's initial setup phase was very simple."
"Their technical support has been quite good."
"The initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment took about ten minutes or less."
"The interface is good."
"The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most."
"The most valuable feature is the addition of managed tools that help us create customizable rules. In case we want to block a particular request, we can make use of those rules."
"The three most valuable features that I noticed are the geo-localization of the user, the IP reputation, and the compartmental analysis."
"The price could be improved."
"On the UI side, I would like it if they could bring back the geolocation view on the corner."
"It will be helpful if the product recommends rules that we can implement."
"They have to do more to improve, to innovate more features. They need to increase the security. It has to be more active in detecting threats."
"The setup is complicated."
"The pricing model is complicated."
"The cost management has room for improvement."
"AWS WAF would be better if it uses AI or machine learning to detect a potential attack or a potential IP that creates an attack even before it happens. I want AWS WAF to capture the IP and automatically write the rule to automate the entire process."
"The area that should be improved is licensing."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF). AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.