Compare Azure Active Directory vs. Idaptive
Sponsored
 | NadeemAkhtar1 Principal Service Engineer at a energy/utilities company |
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Active Directory vs. Idaptive and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It scales in terms of numbers and types of identities. It can govern the on-premise applications as well as the cloud applications. So, it can manage hybrid environments with all types of identities and various load amounts."
"The most valuable feature in Omada is the governance. We work with other products and other product vendors, but the sweet spot in the market for Omada is where things are heavy on governance."
"This solution serves as the basis to understand the MS SSO and MFA capabilities."
"The ability to grant access to other organizations is helpful."
"The interface is well laid out and it is easy to navigate."
"The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to implement, you don't need a lot of effort to set up the solution. This is the most advantageous point, that you can do anything on Azure without taking too much time."
"The single sign-on is very convenient for us."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of scalability."
"The single sign-on of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to set up conditional access, where you can enforce users to connect using multifactor authentication."
"The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory."
"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."
Cons
"They need to improve the cost for small companies."
"I would like to see them expand the functionality of the tool to continue to be competitive with the monsters out there. For example, they could add functionality on the authentication side, functionality that Octa and SailPoint have. But they should do that while maintaining the same simplicity that makes Omada a product of choice today."
"The SSO MyApps interface is very basic and needs better customization capabilities."
"Microsoft needs to add a single setup, so whenever resources join the company or are leaving the company, all of the changes can be made with a single click."
"My only pain point in this solution is creating group membership for devices."
"I would rate it an eight out of ten. The price plays a factor in the rating."
"It would be ideal if the solution moved to a passwordless type of environment. It's the future of authentification. It's also more secure and convenient."
"I think the documentation and configuration are both areas that need improvement."
"We would like to have more granularity in the Azure conditional access in order to be able to manage more groups for devices and for applications."
"Technical support could be faster."
"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."
"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."
"The pricing is too high for SMBs."
"Omada continues to be very competitive on pricing, especially on the Omada cloud product."
"Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis and the cost depends on the number of users."
"This product is sold as part of the enterprise package and our licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"MFA and P2 licenses for two Azures for fully-enabled scenarios and features cost a lot of money. This is where Okta is trying to get the prices down."
"We are a non-profit organization, so we get good prices from Microsoft for their products. It is working well, but it could be cheaper. For the type of organization we are, it would be good if they could give a little bit more and be more generous like Google, which has completely free services. Microsoft has free versions or web services called Office 365 E1, which is free for use, but we want to have it with more qualified clients."
"We pay about $35 per user."
"I think we're on the E3 — I think it was about 35 dollars per user."
"We got a good deal. If you get rid of all the products providing features that Azure Suite can provide, then it makes sense cost-wise."
"Microsoft has a free version of Azure AD. So, if you don't do a lot of advanced features, then you can use the free version, which is no cost at all because it is underpinning Office 365. Because Microsoft gives it to you as a SaaS, so there are no infrastructure costs whatsoever that you need to incur. If you use the free version, then it is free. If you use the advanced features (that we use), it is a license fee per user."
"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: The most valuable feature in Omada is the governance. We work with other products and other product vendors, but the… more »
Top Answer: Omada continues to be very competitive on pricing, especially on the Omada cloud product.
Top Answer: I would like to see them expand the functionality of the tool to continue to be competitive with the monsters out there… more »
What are the biggest differences between Google Cloud Identity and Microsoft Azure Active Directory?
Top Answer: Both identity providers have their own pros and cons. Google doesn't have a road map for device management though they… more »
Top Answer: The portal version of the Azure active directory is pretty robust.
Top Answer: I think we're on the E3 — I think it was about 35 dollars per user. We may go up to the E5, which includes Project… more »
Top Answer: The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy… more »
Top Answer: They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature.
Top Answer: We sell as well as use this solution for our IT operations. We are using it for single sign-on. We are a small company… more »
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Centrify Application Services
A full-featured identity governance (IGA) solution with a cloud-native architecture for rapid deployment. Omada Identity Cloud is a flexible and future-proof choice that delivers scalable and configurable identity and access management processes with essential IGA capabilities. The solution enables organizations to manage identity lifecycle scenarios, policy and role management, access requests, access certification, and fulfillment using automated provisioning and service tickets. It provides configurable adaptable models out of the box, minimizing the time and cost of administration. Omada Identity Cloud meets the security, compliance, and efficiency needs of business leaders, removing cost and uncertainty from managing identities and access.
The Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) enterprise identity service provides single sign-on and multi-factor authentication to help protect your users from 99.9 percent of cybersecurity attacks. With Azure Active Directory, you get:
- Single sign-on enabling access to your apps from anywhere
- Conditional Access and multi-factor authentication to help protect and govern access
- A single identity platform to engage with internal and external users more securely
- Developer tools to easily integrate identity into your apps and services
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Azure Active Directory Community.
Idaptive delivers Next-Gen Access, protecting organizations through a zero trust approach. With Idaptive, organizations secure access everywhere, reduce complexity and have newfound confidence to adopt modern business models and deliver awesome customer experiences.
Learn more about Omada Identity Cloud
Learn more about Azure Active Directory
Learn more about Idaptive
Azure Active Directory is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.
MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company5%
Financial Services Firm5%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company13%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Computer Software Company9%
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government5%
Financial Services Firm5%
Computer Software Company40%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Government7%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise59%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Active Directory vs. Idaptive and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Azure Active Directory is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 20 reviews while Idaptive is ranked 10th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews. Azure Active Directory is rated 8.2, while Idaptive is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Azure Active Directory writes "Users don't have to remember multiple accounts and passwords since it is all single sign-on". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Idaptive writes "A stable solution for accessing on-premises active directory". Azure Active Directory is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, CyberArk PAS, Google Cloud Identity, ForgeRock and AWS Directory Service, whereas Idaptive is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Intune, SailPoint IdentityNow, Symantec Siteminder and LastPass Enterprise. See our Azure Active Directory vs. Idaptive report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.