Compare Azure NetApp Files vs. Google Cloud Storage

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure NetApp Files vs. Google Cloud Storage and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"If you have a fair amount of experience with NetApp, you can work on it very easily.""The most valuable feature is the ease of file storage.""If anything happens, their technical support will come onsite and fix it.""ONTAP has been very stable for us, specifically in the cloud environment. It allows us to have high availability as well as standalone systems if that's what we want within our specific workloads. Also, on-premise has been a very stable environment. We have very few outages and when we do, we work with support to get systems back online in a timely manner.""The ability for our users to restore data from the Snapshots is very valuable.""Its functionality and technical support are adequate to help prevent failure due to errors.""SnapMirror helps mirror metadata and data volumes between endpoints in a data fabric.""The FlexClones make all the management easier for us."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Pros »

"It has saved a lot of time. Because in the older, conventional hardware system, they need to raise a ticket to go to storage engineering, then storage engineering would increased the size. Now, it's dynamic. You don't have to do anything. This improved the time by more than 50 percent.""The most valuable feature of this solution is its flexibility.""The critical features of this solution are SnapMirror for replication, data protection, and SnapLock.""Using NetApp Files got us out of a really difficult situation quickly, effectively, and at a reasonable cost.""For us, with Azure NetApp Files the ease of use has been big. We have an operations organization where ease of use is key, especially when we're starting to go offshore with that [responsibility] as well.""It's elastic, so it scales with our demands. We can start small, then with the addition of customer loads, we can expand on-the-fly without the need to reprovision something."

More Azure NetApp Files Pros »

"The most valuable features are Pub/Sub, Data Explorer, BigQuery, and Data Transfer.""Their technical support is good and very professional.""Using this solution has improved the security of our data.""The most valuable feature is the cryptographic technology.""What I like about this program, is that it's quite fast, because you pay for your usage.""The feature we've found most valuable is the ability to access our data anywhere, anytime.""The most valuable features are the ease and accessibility of information.""The solution is flexible and very user-friendly."

More Google Cloud Storage Pros »

Cons
"When it comes to support provided by NetApp, they have room for improvement. Every time we go through their support, we end up answering the same routine questions.""The data tiering needs improvement. E.g., moving hard data to faster disks.""I would like to have more management tools. They are difficult to work with, so I would like them to be a bit more user-friendly.""The key feature, that we'd like to see in that is the ability to sync between regions within the AWS and Azure regions. We could use the cloud sync service, but we'd really like that native functionality within the cloud volume service.""I would like to see them improve the perspective of start and search in the panels. This would allow for better visualization of the contents that are captured in the tool.""The navigation on some of the configuration parameters is a bit cumbersome, making the learning curve on functions somewhat steep.""The only issue we had lately was that outside our VPC we could not reach the virtual IP, the floating IP. I heard that they have fixed that...""Scale-up and scale-out could be improved. It would be interesting to have multiple HA pairs on one cluster, for example, or to increase the single instances more, from a performance perspective. It would be good to get more performance out of a single HA pair."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Cons »

"We would like for the files which are coming in that we can version them. So, if a file is accidentally deleted, there should have a recycle bin option where we can go back, and at least once, clean it up.""This solution would be improved with more innovation.""We would like to have backup functionality built-in so that we don't run into the issue where the replication process makes a copy of the corrupted data.""I would like to see multi-zone redundancy so that I don't have to worry about it. I just back up my data to that one SMB share and I know that it's replicated to a different region.""The speed of Azure NetApp Files, from what we PoC'ed, has been tolerable. We've had some challenges with it so far, being in a PoC, but after we [overcame] those challenges, it became tolerable.""I have a hunch that storage could be now the most expensive portion of our monthly bill. So I can imagine that, not this year, but next year we will be talking about looking deeper into ways how we can optimize the cost."

More Azure NetApp Files Cons »

"I would like to see this solution made faster, cheaper, and bigger.""They need to get some parts of the program more mature, like the admin management part as well as the monitoring part.""The user experience needs to be simplified.""The implementation is not as easy as Microsoft, and the process could be improved.""I would also like to be able to use my own tools and packages within this solution and also have a tool to visualize the data with graphics.""User management could be better. It's complicated process to delete users and maintain the structure of documents created by deleted users.""The user interface could be more intuitive.""The solution should improve its security and accountability."

More Google Cloud Storage Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good, but it was a test system, not a real purchase.""We purchased the product directly from NetApp.""The deal with the seller was acceptable; the pricing is reasonable.""The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately.""Compared to other storage vendors, NetApp, is not always able to compete with their pricing. Yet, we acknowledge the ease of use ONTAP brings with the AWS integration.""They allow a special price if you are working closely with them. Since we have a lot of NetApp systems, we got some kind of discount. That's something they do for other customers, not just for us. The price was fair. In addition to the licensing fees, you're paying Amazon for your usage...""The standard pricing is online. Pricing depends. If you're using the PayGo model, then it's just the normal costs on the Microsoft page. If you're using Bring Your Own License, which is what we're doing, then you get with your sales contact at NetApp and start figuring out what price is the best, in the end, for your company.""In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The solution’s combination of the ease of use, simplicity, and reduction in IT management versus the cost has helped a lot. It is very fast to deploy. It's very easy to maintain. You don't have to do a lot in the cloud to maintain this thing, so it gives good performance. It's fast to deploy, easy to maintain, and it gives a better performance. These are the most basic three criteria for any application. This saves cost because the manpower you need to deploy is going down. You're getting better performance and not buying new resources. You have resources available in the cloud. It's just a couple of clicks, then you're good to go.""The performance has improved by about 30 percent.""The licensing fees for this solution vary, ranging from a single shelf to a full suite.""Our pricing has not been determined because we are still waiting on additional features.""NetApp is a premium offering, so it's not a cheap product, but it is well-priced. It combines a couple of properties which customers like us are willing to pay. Could it be cheaper? Yes, but if you combine fully supported, fully managed, easily provisioned, scalable, and quick all in one product, it's a good selling point. You can ask a lot of money for all these. If you have a use case like we do, it's a perfect match. It's like the Porsche of storage solutions in the cloud. It is totally worth the cost."

More Azure NetApp Files Pricing and Cost Advice »

"They know that the pricing is comparable with Azure, AWS, and those other solutions like Amazon are cheaper, but they are not as flexible.""Better pricing would be helpful."

More Google Cloud Storage Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It's elastic, so it scales with our demands. We can start small, then with the addition of customer loads, we can expand… more »
Top Answer: NetApp is a premium offering, so it's not a cheap product, but it is well-priced. It combines a couple of properties… more »
Top Answer: I have a hunch that storage could be now the most expensive portion of our monthly bill. So I can imagine that, not this… more »
Top Answer: The solution is flexible and very user-friendly.
Top Answer: The solution is free to use and comes with one terabyte of free memory. If you need more than that, you may have to pay.
Top Answer: I'm not sure if there are any improvements necessary. For my purposes, it works very well. The solution should improve… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Also Known As
ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVONetApp ANF, ANF
Learn
NetApp
NetApp
Google
Overview

The leading enterprise-grade storage management solution, delivers secure, proven storage management services and supports up to a capacity of 368TB. Software service supports various use cases, such as: File shares and block-level storage serving NAS (NFS, SMB / CIFS) and SAN (iSCSI) Disaster Recovery, Backup, and Archive DevOps Databases (SQL, Oracle, NoSQL) Cloud Volumes ONTAP is offered in a standard single-node configuration or in a High Availability (HA) configuration.

Extreme File Performance
Azure NetApp Files allows you to target any of your business-critical file workloads with extreme file throughput with sub-millisecond response times.With three service levels you can change on-the-fly, you get the performance that’s best suited to the application.

Simple, Seamless Experience
A seamless Azure experience for your file services workloads. You can deploy and manage Azure NetApp Files directory from the Azure Portal or automate using the Azure API or CLI integration.

Secure Your Data
Built-in capabilities ensure your data is protected at all times in Azure: from always-on encryption to point-in-time data copies (without added capacity costs). And with Microsoft‘s world class support, you can rest assured that you‘re in good hands with Azure.

Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage. Google created three simple product options to help you address the needs of your applications while keeping your costs low. These three product options use the same API, providing you with a simple and consistent method of access.

Offer
Take Control with Unified Cloud Storage

Sign up for a 30-day trial to see how Cloud Volumes ONTAP can help you optimize cloud storage costs and performance, while enhancing data enterprise-grade protection, security, and compliance - wherever your data lives.

Run your most demanding Linux and Windows file workloads in Azure

Running performance-intensive and latency-sensitive file workloads in the cloud can be hard. Use Azure NetApp Files to migrate and run complex, file-based applications and simplify storage management.

Learn more about Google Cloud Storage
Sample Customers
Rohit, AdvacnedMD, D2L, Trinity Mirror, Eidos Media, WireStorm, Cordant Group, JFK Medical Center, ALD Automotive, Healthix, City of Baton Rouge, ON Semiconductor SAP, Restaurant MagicAutism Speaks, Backflip Studios, Beneficio Facil, Bitmovin, Claritics, CloudBerry, Cosentry, DNANexus, DNAstack, Energyworx, Feedly, GenieConnect, HTC, JustDevelopIt, LeadPages, Leanplum, LiveHive, Mendelics, Ocado, RealMassive, Screenz, ShareThis, Songpop, Ubisoft, VendAsta, Webydo, Wix, zulily
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company27%
Comms Service Provider10%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Transportation Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider18%
Manufacturing Company12%
Media Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Manufacturing Company18%
Comms Service Provider15%
Media Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider23%
Media Company17%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise80%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise81%
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure NetApp Files vs. Google Cloud Storage and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Azure NetApp Files is ranked 3rd in Cloud Storage with 6 reviews while Google Cloud Storage is ranked 5th in Cloud Storage with 8 reviews. Azure NetApp Files is rated 8.4, while Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Azure NetApp Files writes "We can expand our storage on-the-fly without the need to reprovision". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Keeps customer data secure and well managed". Azure NetApp Files is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Dropbox, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct, whereas Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Huawei FusionStorage and Citrix ShareFile. See our Azure NetApp Files vs. Google Cloud Storage report.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors and best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.