We compared CylancePROTECT and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is the preferred product over CylancePROTECT as it offers comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities, leveraging machine learning, behavior-based analysis, and real-time monitoring. Users praise its intuitive user interface, easy deployment, and efficient threat-hunting features. It also provides seamless integration with other security tools, making it a flexible and reliable choice for businesses of all sizes.
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"I have access to it from anywhere."
"The tool alerts about lateral internet movements."
"Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's installation is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use and simple, meaning it's not much complicated."
"The solution is probably one of the top five, best security solutions on the market at the moment."
"It's hard to pick just one valuable feature as almost all of the main features are very useful. However, the ability to manage it centrally and have detailed control over settings, exceptions and other configurations is extremely beneficial."
"It is a very stable solution."
"It is easy to scale and it is suitable for organizations from small businesses to enterprise."
"Very easy to deploy. It can be done one by one or deployed by customizing an MSI file for GPO push."
"The Application Guard and ByteGuard are useful features."
"I find the actual overall endpoint malware protection the most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT."
"The most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT is the support."
"You can manage all the threats and everything from a centralized dashboard."
"A user can continue to add endpoints and the solution will continue to perform well."
"Centralized dashboard online which can be used for managing a huge product."
"Two or three years ago when the WannaCry virus struck, the people that were on Cylance were the ones that weren't affected."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The solution is not stable."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The support needs improvement."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Areas for improvement would be performance and pricing."
"The product can be improved by identifying errors."
"We would like to see password management integrated into the solution because I don't like having a third-party password management system."
"They were working on the encryption management for laptops, and if they complete it then it would be helpful."
"While the solution is secure, it could have better integration."
"The one thing I'd say about their complete MDR product is that it's too expensive, which is why I prefer to use an alternative SOC and integrate Bitdefender to a different SOC on their own."
"They should improve the solution's patch management feature."
"The reporting is much too simple."
"They could improve on the false positives, reporting and whitelisting features."
"Work on the math model. We are catching a lot of false positives, which gets to be a pain at the start of a deployment."
"Reporting is an area with shortcomings in CylancePROTECT that needs to be improved."
"The solution’s user interface could be improved."
"The product needs to continue to offer better alerts. In particular, around false positives. It needs to reduce them from happening."
"While you are working, you are finding these things that were supposed to be waived have come back to being blocked. That's frustrating."
"I'd like them to do software distribution too, but they said that that's architecturally not at the product line."
"We would like to see secure integration and multi-factor authentication to be able to access the administration dashboard."
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is ranked 15th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 54 reviews while CylancePROTECT is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is rated 8.6, while CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR writes "High-quality threat intelligence, including encryption and mobile device protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Intercept X Endpoint and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, whereas CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security. See our Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. CylancePROTECT report.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.