We performed a comparison between BMC Remedy and ManageEngine IT Asset Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an exceptionally robust and seamlessly integrated solution that has greatly facilitated our operations."
"It has some good features for tracking. They also have a cloud and a mobile access feature."
"This product is good because it allows us to receive proper responses to business emails anywhere and anytime. It helps in effective communication with employees. The solution is stable. The product is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward. I recommend BMC Remedy, especially for its automation capabilities."
"It includes features for automation, such as smart reporting capabilities."
"The most valuable BMC Remedy Asset Management are the dashboards and reports for the CIO."
"It has a good peer sharing module."
"You can develop plugins in different languages, and the workflows can be easily developed depending on the user's needs."
"The most valuable feature of the solution includes all of its components since they act as the authentication system of the product."
"The auto-discovery feature has helped us a lot."
"In my opinion, it is the MDM; patch management and deployment are the valuable features."
"The technical support is great."
"The desktop technicians face some challenges with the solution."
"I would like to have more customized reporting because the management team loves customized reports with graphs."
"BMC Remedy Asset Management could improve by adding intuitive dashboards."
"Continuous improvement is recommended."
"One area that requires improvement is the prevention of duplicates or data inconsistencies in the system."
"BMC Remedy's change management module needs enhancement."
"The UI is quite outdated."
"Integration and deployment could be better. It could be easier and faster to integrate and deploy. It would also help if we could have a 360-degree view. It would be better if they changed it to a SaaS type of offering, which is becoming the standard."
"The asset management tool is costly."
"The assets that can be discovered are pretty easy to manage, but there should be a better way to manage non-discoverable assets. Our development team works on bots and tests particular hardware. They have got different varieties of hardware. They want a feature for managing these assets within a warehouse kind of environment. For example, our IT has received 100 items, and they have assigned these items as a bulk unit to a project manager. The project manager further wants to distribute these items within his or her team. Instead of maintaining a separate Excel sheet, the project manager should be able to reallocate these items from within the tool so that we have hierarchical entities for the same unit."
"The engineering area needs improvement."
More ManageEngine IT Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC Remedy is ranked 5th in IT Asset Management with 19 reviews while ManageEngine IT Asset Management is ranked 11th in IT Asset Management with 3 reviews. BMC Remedy is rated 8.2, while ManageEngine IT Asset Management is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of BMC Remedy writes "Great CMDB design, helpful technical support, and great features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine IT Asset Management writes "Stable and scalable solution ". BMC Remedy is most compared with ServiceNow, BMC Helix Discovery, Snow License Manager, Qualys VMDR and VMware Service Manager, whereas ManageEngine IT Asset Management is most compared with Lansweeper, Freshservice, Axonius, ServiceNow and Qualys VMDR. See our BMC Remedy vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management report.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors and best License Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.