We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and MuleSoft Composer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while MuleSoft Composer is ranked 9th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 3 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while MuleSoft Composer is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Azure Data Factory, whereas MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Zapier. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. MuleSoft Composer report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
