We performed a comparison between Broadcom Clarity and Bubble Innovator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management."Clarity PPM's strongest features are project and resource management."
"The performance is really good."
"The interfaces for project management, portfolio management, and reporting services are always helpful."
"What has been valuable are the workflows that are there today in order to keep our executive staff informed as well as our program managers and department managers."
"We have flexible scrum teams, developers that will serve on one scrum team for a few sprints or for a project. Being able to track where people go with the resource management features, and making sure that our teams are fully staffed, is important."
"It has improved communication vertically, with some amount of data to be able to show that more resources are necessary, or why projects aren't moving as fast as management would like. That sort of communication makes my job a lot easier."
"Visibility is the number one feature. They can see where the bottlenecks are, they can see what their project statuses are, why are things being held up, etc."
"Absolutely, the most active community I have ever been on."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that its workflows are really impressive."
"The user interface (UI) needs to be improved. Right now, it's not the best."
"The only real improvement from my side - I'm spoiled by things like Trello, with the very easy user interface, things like Basecamp - it's very much a static software project. If I was to focus on something it would be that user interface; making that something that is a joy to use, instead of something that feels like data entry."
"Their online documentation is okay. It is not great. It is hard to get to some of the answers to the things that we may be running into, such as use cases that we are trying to fix. So, frequently we have to put in tickets."
"The classic UI is very cumbersome. It can do everything but it's hard to use. It's easy to use once you understand it, but it's intimidating at first for somebody to see the solution."
"When we upgraded to 15.1, we had some challenges around Jaspersoft, and also some issues with supporting some of the complex process work flows that we had designed internally, that were affected by some changes in the process engine."
"The Latin American support could be better due to the language barrier."
"The forms (e.g., project properties page) need to be more attractive, colorful, and field more flexibility for validations."
"I would like to see more team-based management, and less people-based management; as far as the resource management goes, to do it per team and not per person."
"The designs provided by Bubble Innovator have certain shortcomings that need improvement."
Broadcom Clarity is ranked 2nd in Project Portfolio Management with 136 reviews while Bubble Innovator is ranked 17th in Project Portfolio Management with 1 review. Broadcom Clarity is rated 8.0, while Bubble Innovator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Clarity writes "A dynamic solution with a lot of great out-of-the-box calculations, but integration with reporting utilities is a bit painful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bubble Innovator writes "A tool to help create mobile and web applications that ensure its users experience a return on investment from its use". Broadcom Clarity is most compared with Microsoft Project, Jira, Planview Portfolios, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and Smartsheet, whereas Bubble Innovator is most compared with .
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
