We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare BrowserStack vs. TestProject

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BrowserStack Logo
6,168 views|5,327 comparisons
TestProject Logo
3,410 views|1,638 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: December 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development.""It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it.""The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials.""The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful.""I like that it offers full device capability.""Testing across devices and browsers without maintaining that inventory is invaluable."

More BrowserStack Pros »

"The automation and AI are very good.""Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge.""Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

More TestProject Pros »

Cons
"Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product.""Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience.""I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms.""Adding better integration with frameworks, particularly testing frameworks like Robot, would be of more value to customers and make their jobs easier."

More BrowserStack Cons »

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available.""TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management.""Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

More TestProject Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price is fine.""This solution costs less than competing products."

More BrowserStack Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I like that it offers full device capability.
Top Answer: Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product.
Top Answer: Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge.
Top Answer: I have had some difficulty trying to configure it on several browsers. I was able to configure several tests, but I can run in one browser only. Whenever I run a test they always fail when they need… more »
Top Answer: I'm a QA specialist and customer of TestProject.
Ranking
16th
Views
6,168
Comparisons
5,327
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
528
Rating
8.0
18th
Views
3,410
Comparisons
1,638
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
334
Rating
7.7
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

Offer
Learn more about BrowserStack
Learn more about TestProject
Sample Customers
Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG
IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm7%
Insurance Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm6%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise43%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: December 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BrowserStack is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while TestProject is ranked 18th in Test Automation Tools with 3 reviews. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while TestProject is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Test against a huge range of device and browser combinations but expect some connectivity issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestProject writes "Feels very complete for the kind of tool, the options and the service that it provides". BrowserStack is most compared with Perfecto, Sauce Labs, LambdaTest, CrossBrowserTesting and Tricentis Tosca, whereas TestProject is most compared with Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, LambdaTest and Micro Focus UFT Mobile.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.