We performed a comparison between BusinessGenetics xBML and MEGA HOPEX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design."One of the things that I have found most valuable is that it is very easy to use. For example, they have built-in existing processes that you can easily modify."
"We use the portfolio management feature heavily."
"Its availability is very good."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reuse of common enterprise components and entities."
"The most valuable feature is that the software controls everything from a single management window."
"The initial setup was straightforward. With configuration, customizing or prepping the data and deployment, it took about one year to set up. We only needed two people to deploy and maintain the solution: one business architect and someone who specializes in customization and operations."
"The platform is stable."
"The tool is very simple and intuitive to use."
"You do not need to be a professional of enterprise modeling to contribute to the enrichment and improvement of the enterprise repository."
"At the moment there are very few people who can lead training for the product. I think that area needs to improve."
"The interface must be improved."
"It has a data domain where we load our data objects onto the tool but doesn't provide data governance capabilities such as cleansing or validating data."
"The tool usability is weak and it also has a high learning curve."
"MEGA HOPEX's problem is that it is expensive, but it's a fantastic tool."
"The initial setup is a little complex."
"Better documentation and training would be helpful."
"Standardization is lacking. The Operational Risk Function will be more effective if it at a default level follows established Basel standards for Loss categorization, Risk Assessments, Risk Event categorization, etc."
"Lacking more out of the box integrations."
Earn 20 points
BusinessGenetics xBML is ranked 29th in Business Process Design while MEGA HOPEX is ranked 8th in Business Process Design with 36 reviews. BusinessGenetics xBML is rated 8.0, while MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BusinessGenetics xBML writes "Has built-in, existing processes that can be easily modified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Easy to use and robust with good features". BusinessGenetics xBML is most compared with , whereas MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Avolution ABACUS and Visio.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.