Compare BusinessGenetics xBML vs. MEGA HOPEX

BusinessGenetics xBML is ranked 19th in Business Process Design with 1 review while MEGA HOPEX is ranked 13th in Business Process Design with 7 reviews. BusinessGenetics xBML is rated 8.0, while MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of BusinessGenetics xBML writes "Has built-in, existing processes that can be easily modified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "A straightforward initial setup with helpful technical support". BusinessGenetics xBML is most compared with , whereas MEGA HOPEX is most compared with ARIS BPM, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, Bizagi and iServer.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
32,196 views|20,961 comparisons
MEGA HOPEX Logo
7,445 views|4,003 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use BusinessGenetics xBML? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Signavio, camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design. Updated: July 2020.
430,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.It has an open BPMIt allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.

More Camunda BPM Pros »

One of the things that I have found most valuable is that it is very easy to use. For example, they have built-in existing processes that you can easily modify.

More BusinessGenetics xBML Pros »

The interface is very simple and easy to navigate.The most valuable feature is that the software controls everything from a single management window.The solution is scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it's completely possible to do so.I find the IT portfolio management very valuable and helpful.The most valuable feature of this solution is the reuse of common enterprise components and entities.The initial setup was straightforward. With configuration, customizing or prepping the data and deployment, it took about one year to set up. We only needed two people to deploy and maintain the solution: one business architect and someone who specializes in customization and operations.The most valuable feature for this solution is the automatic updating and propagation of changes across the system.

More MEGA HOPEX Pros »

Cons
The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages.Lacking in forms visualization.If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.I would also like a very easy to use form builder.I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself.

More Camunda BPM Cons »

At the moment there are very few people who can lead training for the product. I think that area needs to improve.

More BusinessGenetics xBML Cons »

The solution could make the implementation process easier.I would like to see more regular updates released.The features are limited. I'm hoping in the future the solution will be bigger and include more items. Right now, overall, it needs more.Scalability can be a problem sometimes.The tool usability is weak and it also has a high learning curve.They do tend to push people to their professional services, instead of helping the customers with their problems. I understand this is their business. At the same time, however, they need to work on fact sheets or offer some program to help the customers who want to implement it themselves and to make it run properly in their environment.We would like to see integration with other products, such as being able to use our workflow with SharePoint and Microsoft Office.

More MEGA HOPEX Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I use the open-source free version.Camunda is much cheaper.We are using the open-source version of this solution.It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
It is very expensive.If you want to use additional features, such as the Risk Management capability, then it is a little too expensive.

More MEGA HOPEX Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
430,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
xBML
Learn
camunda
BusinessGenetics
Video Not Available
MEGA International
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation
BusinessGenetics xBML (extended Business Modelling Language) is an intuitive graphical language that unlocks the DNA of a corporation using a system of diagrams based on five Ws (Who; What; Which; Where; When). xBML gives companies an complete and accurate map of their enterprise, that can then be re-used repeatedly to describe, plan and create improvement.

MEGA’s HOPEX platform helps you to understand the relationships throughout your company’s ecosystem. If you think of your business like a Jenga tower, pulling out the wrong block could collapse your tower. MEGA provides visibility that enables you to make intelligent decisions and strategic investments, respond to market changes, and ensure that strategies are linked to execution. Now you’ll know which blocks to pull, and why.

With MEGA’s software platform, manage enterprise complexity for optimal business performance. Gain a stronger understanding of your organization’s strategy, investments, processes, risks, and IT landscape. We’re proud to have customers who have achieved a 300+% ROI. Together, let’s see how we can do even better for your business.  

Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about BusinessGenetics xBML
Learn more about MEGA HOPEX
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentQwest, Wachovia, Corporate Express, State of Colorado, Bank of AmericaAetna, Fannie Mae, M&T Bank, Glatfelter Insurance Group, Zions Management Services Company, The College Board, Baxter Credit Union, AXA Financial, Missouri Department of Conservation, New York State OTDA, MEG Energy Corp, Walgreens, Procter & Gamble, Biogen Idec, Gilead Sciences, Organic Valley, Trinity Health, Nissan and Ford
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Non Profit25%
Comms Service Provider13%
Construction Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company6%
Government6%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm44%
Insurance Company22%
Aerospace/Defense Firm11%
Healthcare Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Government13%
Insurance Company11%
Comms Service Provider11%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business55%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise30%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise72%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business28%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise44%
Find out what your peers are saying about Signavio, camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design. Updated: July 2020.
430,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.