• Home
  • CA Testing Tools [EOL] vs. CrossBrowserTesting

CA Testing Tools [EOL] vs CrossBrowserTesting comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo

CA Testing Tools [EOL]

views| comparisons
SmartBear Logo

CrossBrowserTesting

Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews
1,326 views|987 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Testing Tools [EOL] and CrossBrowserTesting based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use CA Testing Tools [EOL]?
Michael Hutchison
Static screenshots are the feature most often used, because they are a simple method of detecting problems
Our site's conversion from a static to an adaptive flexible layout was a major goal for our web site, and CrossBrowserTesting was an invaluable... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."
  • "A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."
  • "CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."
  • "It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."
  • "SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

    • More CrossBrowserTesting Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Functional Testing Tools
    27th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    1,326
    Comparisons
    987
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    SmartBear
    Overview
    Information Not Available

    CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

    • Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
    • Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.
    Sample Customers
    a.s.r.
    St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    University7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government10%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Testing Tools [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while CrossBrowserTesting is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools. CA Testing Tools [EOL] is rated 0.0, while CrossBrowserTesting is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of CrossBrowserTesting writes "Static screenshots are the feature most often used, because they are a simple method of detecting problems". CA Testing Tools [EOL] is most compared with , whereas CrossBrowserTesting is most compared with BrowserStack, Bitbar, Tricentis Tosca, LambdaTest and Sauce Labs.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.