Compare CrossBrowserTesting vs. LambdaTest

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Worksoft Certify Logo
14,054 views|4,374 comparisons
CrossBrowserTesting Logo
3,652 views|2,014 comparisons
LambdaTest Logo
1,049 views|676 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. LambdaTest and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"With autotesting, we have been able to eliminate duplication of test cases across those four areas. This has helped us knock down our number of test cases. Our test cases are also running more optimally. Therefore, it has very much helped in that sense, so we were able to eliminate a lot of test cases and get out of manual silos by running on autotesting, which is more efficient.""It is a pretty easy tool to use as far as automated testing tools go.""The biggest feature is the fact that it's codeless. It takes away the problem of finding people with the correct programming language, since there are multiple such languages. It saves time in introducing people to the solution because they don't need programming knowledge, they just need to be able to think logically. This makes it vastly usable by more people who are not even acquainted with IT at all.""It does allow for good reusability. When it's designed properly and utilized properly, we can put things in a way that allows for reusability, meaning a lot of reuse of VA01, if they're very similar flows, to keep it simple.""Certify integrates with other tools and it works very well with other machine testing applications.""It's pretty seamless with SAP and Salesforce because they've built in the field definitions and all the things that you need. You literally turn it on and execute your script and it records it. It's very simple. Then you can go back and put in some of the other functions. For example, instead of hard-coding field selections, you put in a data table so you can run it multiple times or with multiple data. It was actually written to work very well with SAP.""Certify's web UI testing abilities for testing of modern applications like SAP Fiori was good when we started and they developed it to be even better. We all know that web applications can change objects in DOM quite fast and it breaks tests. To counter it Certify has made object recognition more flexible and generic, so we don't have any troubles.""The scripting methodology is easy to learn. It is easy to maintain because it is presented in a simple, narrative way. You don't need to know programming." "It has reduced our test maintenance time by more than 50 percent because we don't have to do manual test processes. We have saved over 150 man-hours monthly. It has increased our delivery times. We went from 200 man-hours down (three weeks work time frame) to approximately 40 man-hours (three days work time frame)."

More Worksoft Certify Pros »

"Record and Replay is the most used functionality for us, as we can record the test cases and play them on multiple combinations of platforms.""CrossBrowserTesting allows us to test our site with real-world devices in real-world scenarios and find what we're missing.""When developing new pages that have questionable functionality or coding, we will often use CBT to test it in a browser. CBT works with our testing environment and development site.""I can run a page through the screenshot tool, then send a URL with the results to my team.""Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data."

More CrossBrowserTesting Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems.""This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!""In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues.""Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours.""The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel.""LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more.""The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily.""Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"

More LambdaTest Pros »

Cons
"It would be great if our business testers could develop their own automated test cases. With every release you do, you have to go back and touch your old test cases and bring them up to speed, or develop new test cases. In the beginning, that is a challenge because you have to have someone who is certified in the tool to help you develop these test cases.""Performance on the web UI part, especially with some of the more comprehensive Fiori features, like the complex tables that are being used, could be improved. In those cases we have noticed a lot of execution-time increase with regards to the Certify solution.""An area that I would like to see improved is how the permissions are applied. If you're applying permissions groups to a user, one of the options is to delete the group entirely and lose the entire permission group, rather than just deleting the permission from the user, which seems a little silly. In my opinion, that whole module of permissions is very confusing and lends itself to common errors.""Pricing is a bit high and we would like to have the availability of a trail environment for beginners and training would be great to have and easier to expand and use by more and more consultants.""Better automation capability would be helpful.""With the codeless process automation across packaged applications, once in a while, if we get a weird application that's not widely used, it gets a little stickier. First, the software has to learn the fields, so you have to identify all the fields. Once you do that, as long as there isn’t any non-standard code in the application, then it works fine. But there's that one step that you have to do, a step you don't have to do with SAP and Salesforce, for example.""When it comes to mobile testing, we have a small bottleneck there. You have to buy third-party separate licenses if you want to test on a mobile. Business wise we see room for improvement there, although it's that really critical for us.""Worksoft Certify needs a bit of improvement for its web-based processes. It can be difficult because you need to recall the maps, then you still have to add-on for your browser. When you are using the browser-based testing, you cannot even move your mouse or do anything on your system when you are using the web-based testing. Therefore, it needs a bit of improvement on that side. While it does work, it needs improvement. From the SAP side, there is nothing better than Worksoft Certify. However, from the web-based, we are moving towards Fiori. SAP will soon be totally web-based. For Fiori, they need to be great with SAP testing. Thus, Worksoft has to improve the web-based testing part for Certify."

More Worksoft Certify Cons »

"It would be useful if we can run the live-testing test cases on multiple platforms at the same time, instead of waiting for one session to finish.""This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices.""The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default.""Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing."

More CrossBrowserTesting Cons »

"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them.""Mobile application testing would be helpful for us.""The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive.""I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool.""It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing.""Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use.""You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only.""Their smart testing module needs improvement."

More LambdaTest Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is a cost involved to doing it, but once you get over the initial cost, then you'll start reaping the benefits and seeing that testing is getting done more quickly and efficiently. We are still early on with it, but the expectation and what we're seeing is that we will start seeing some savings coming out on the back-end once we have this done.""The price is in line with everyone else's in the market. They are not cheaper nor more expensive than anyone else who was in our RFP.""The initial investment is probably a little high. It was a little hard for me to sell, but it was a one-shot deal and that's why it's so high. All we are doing now is paying annual maintenance, which we don't have to do if we don't want upgrades, but we do.""Purchasing and licensing are okay. Go for the perpetual licenses. In that way, you own a license, then you can purchase maintenance and support on top of that, so you don't have to pay every year for it. Even if you don't want it a contract with Worksoft Certify in the future, you will have your own license of it. Then, if your usage is not that much, you can have one or two perpetual licenses. However, if you want to run your processes, you will need more licenses, e.g., using the run-only licenses. They are really cheap compared to the full licensing."

More Worksoft Certify Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers.""SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

More CrossBrowserTesting Pricing and Cost Advice »

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month.""This is an affordable product.""The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it.""It is affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions.""LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it.""It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy.""It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

More LambdaTest Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
479,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the ability to automate quickly and to maintain and update scripts.
Top Answer: Purchasing and licensing are okay. Go for the perpetual licenses. In that way, you own a license, then you can purchase… more »
Top Answer: We would like this to be able to be used outside of SAP applications, as it would be good for other types of products.
Top Answer: Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not… more »
Top Answer: SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together. If you find yourself utilizing other project management… more »
Top Answer: Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time… more »
Top Answer: The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job… more »
Top Answer: It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy.
Top Answer: I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes. Though the stability is good… more »
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

  • Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
  • Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.

LambdaTest is a scalable cloud-based cross browser testing platform designed to offer all software testing need to cloud infrastructure. LambdaTest platform helps you to ensure your web app elements (such as JavaScript, CSS, HTLM5, Video...etc.) render seamlessly across every desktop and mobile web browser with support of manual, visual, and automated testing. With LambdaTest, you can access up to 2000+ combinations of desktop and mobile browsers on cloud. We also offer a Selenium grid which supports 32 test automation frameworks with respect to various programming languages(Java, JavaScipt, C#, Ruby, PHP and Python). Our Selenium grid will help you execute parallel test sessions simultaneously, to significantly reduce your test cycles and increase your product delivery efficiency. LambdaTest provides you one-click bug logging feature that allows you to log a bug directly from LambdaTest platform to various bug management tools like Jira, Asana, Trello, Github, Paymo, TeamWork, Mantis, Hive and many more with just a single click. This is only a tip of an iceberg, there is lot more to LambdaTest. We are continuously expanding our platform as we aim to deliver you a holistic solution for all your testing requirements.

Offer
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Learn more about CrossBrowserTesting
Learn more about LambdaTest
Sample Customers
Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia
Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company28%
Consumer Goods Company13%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Logistics Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm8%
Manufacturing Company7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm22%
University11%
Healthcare Company11%
Media Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider17%
Media Company9%
Insurance Company6%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company38%
Financial Services Firm25%
Manufacturing Company13%
Aerospace/Defense Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider19%
Construction Company10%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise85%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise71%
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise47%
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise36%
Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. LambdaTest and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CrossBrowserTesting is ranked 12th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews while LambdaTest is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 13 reviews. CrossBrowserTesting is rated 9.4, while LambdaTest is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of CrossBrowserTesting writes "Live testing gives us the ability to identify potential issues on different browsers and devices proving to be a very useful tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Reliable, integrates well with other platforms, and is less costly than our previous solution". CrossBrowserTesting is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Eggplant Functional, whereas LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, TestProject and SmartBear TestComplete. See our CrossBrowserTesting vs. LambdaTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.