We performed a comparison between Camunda and MEGA HOPEX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."
"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."
"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"The flexibility characteristic in a BPMS, through BPMN and DMN, is undoubtedly the most interesting feature for our business."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"The platform is stable."
"The solution itself was easy to use."
"I find the IT portfolio management very valuable and helpful."
"The main feature I find crucial in MEGA HOPEX is the catalog view, which provides a comprehensive visualization of all artifacts in one repository. Another valuable aspect is the availability of out-of-the-box outcomes, such as strategy maps and BPA models, eliminating the need for additional configuration. MEGA HOPEX allows users to focus on specific business areas, like risk management or data governance, providing a high-level overview while enabling deep dives into specific areas of interest. For risk management, MEGA HOPEX allows users to assess impacts, create recovery plans, and track action plans."
"It is very interactive."
"What's most valuable in MEGA HOPEX is that it follows the reference model where each component is defined. I also like the diagram consistency in MEGA HOPEX."
"The solution is scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it's completely possible to do so."
"Its availability is very good."
"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."
"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"MEGA HOPEX can improve process simulation in the BPA module. If the solution was better we would not have to use another solution for this purpose. Simulating scenarios in the future for the to-be processes is in demand. If we can have the simulation engine built inside MEGA HOPEX, we would not have to purchase another license or solution to integrate them with each other. This would be a great improvement."
"They do tend to push people to their professional services, instead of helping the customers with their problems. I understand this is their business. At the same time, however, they need to work on fact sheets or offer some program to help the customers who want to implement it themselves and to make it run properly in their environment."
"The tool usability is weak and it also has a high learning curve."
"I cannot recall coming across any missing features."
"The interface must be improved."
"The initial setup is a little complex."
"MEGA HOPEX's problem is that it is expensive, but it's a fantastic tool."
"It would be great if this solution could integrate with other tools such as ITSM (ServiceNow) or CMDB."
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 69 reviews while MEGA HOPEX is ranked 8th in Business Process Design with 36 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Easy to use and robust with good features". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Avolution ABACUS and Lucidchart. See our Camunda vs. MEGA HOPEX report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.