We performed a comparison between Camunda and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate."
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"The solution is good for data models."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"The BPMN diagram is valuable. For our use case of transferring money from one account to another, the connections have to be done in the traditional financial ways. There are a lot of unexpected errors and a lot of instability with this kind of system, and we are using Camunda in order to have clear flows. With BPMN, I can show a flow to my business partner, and the business team can easily understand what's going on. The technical team can understand what the implementation is, and we can model different errors and the process for recovering from these errors."
"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bonita, Appian and Nintex Process Platform. See our Camunda vs. ProcessMaker report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
