We performed a comparison between Cassandra and MarkLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."
"The technical evaluation is very good."
"I am getting much better performance than relational databases."
"The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming."
"Our primary use case for the solution is testing."
"The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level."
"The most valuable feature of Cassandra is its fast retrieval. Additionally, the solution can handle large amounts of data. It is the quickest application we use."
"The solution's database capabilities are very good."
"The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details."
"MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added."
"It can be difficult to analyze what's going on inside of the database relative to other databases. It can also be difficult to troubleshoot sometimes."
"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."
"Maybe they can improve their performance in data fetching from a high volume of data sets."
"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."
"Cassandra can improve by adding more built-in tools. For example, if you want to do some maintenance activities in the cluster, we have to depend on third-party tools. Having these tools build-in would be e benefit."
"Interface is not user friendly."
"Cassandra could be more user-friendly like MongoDB."
"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."
"The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved."
"One of the most common requests is to improve the user interface of the database. While it is primarily a database, there are other databases available that offer more user-friendly interfaces. The UI is good for developers but not for regular users. More visuals would be beneficial."
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while MarkLogic is ranked 9th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while MarkLogic is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MarkLogic writes "Frequent updates, helpful search capabilities, and high quality support". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, InfluxDB, MongoDB, ScyllaDB and Oracle NoSQL, whereas MarkLogic is most compared with MongoDB. See our Cassandra vs. MarkLogic report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
