Compare Cassandra vs. Oracle NoSQL

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cassandra Logo
4,441 views|3,496 comparisons
Oracle NoSQL Logo
1,193 views|1,005 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Oracle NoSQL? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Cloudera, Apache and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: November 2020.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The technical evaluation is very good.""The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level.""The solution's database capabilities are very good.""The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing."

More Cassandra Pros »

"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."

More Oracle NoSQL Pros »

Cons
"Interface is not user friendly.""Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge.""The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working.""The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."

More Cassandra Cons »

"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."

More Oracle NoSQL Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The product is expensive and Oracle could work to lower the licensing cost."

More Oracle NoSQL Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: SQreamDB is a GPU DB. It is not suitable for real-time oltp of course. Cassandra is best suited for OLTP database use cases, when you need a scalable database (instead of SQL server, Postgres)… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
3rd
out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
Views
4,441
Comparisons
3,496
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
446
Avg. Rating
8.5
6th
out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
Views
1,193
Comparisons
1,005
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,124
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Learn
Apache
Oracle
Overview
A scalable multi-master database with no single points of failure. Scalability & high availability without compromising performance.

The Oracle NoSQL Database (ONDB) provides network-accessible multiterabyte distributed key/value pair storage with predictable latency. Data is stored in a very flexible key-value format, where the key consists of the combination of a major and minor key (represented as a string) and an associated value (represented as a JSON data format or opaque set of bytes). It offers full Create, Read, Update and Delete (CRUD) operations, with adjustable durability and consistency guarantees. It also provides powerful and flexible transactional model that eases the application development.

The Oracle NoSQL Database is designed to be a highly available and extremely scalable system, with predictable levels of throughput and latency, while requiring minimal administrative interaction.

For more information on Oracle NoSQL Database, visit Oracle.com

Offer
Learn more about Cassandra
Learn more about Oracle NoSQL
Sample Customers
Apple, BazaarVoice, Best Buy, eBay, NetflixAirbus, Globacom, WebAction
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider23%
Media Company6%
Manufacturing Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider15%
K 12 Educational Company Or School13%
Financial Services Firm11%
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Cloudera, Apache and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: November 2020.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cassandra is ranked 3rd in NoSQL Databases with 4 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review. Cassandra is rated 8.6, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Great time series data feature but it requires third parties to join tables". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "Proper dimensioning is the key to success with this solid performer". Cassandra is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, Accumulo, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and Apache HBase, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, InfluxDB, Couchbase and Neo4j.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.