Catchpoint vs Hitachi JP1 Operations Analytics [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Catchpoint and Hitachi JP1 Operations Analytics [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nexthink, Lakeside Software, Riverbed and others in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM).
To learn more, read our detailed Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."
  • "In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."
  • "The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."
  • "The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."
  • More Catchpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Catchpoint provides a great amount of information.
    Top Answer:I rate the price a two out of ten, where one is a high price and ten is a low price.
    Top Answer:Catchpoint tries to cover the full stack of other computers. However, it is not a good idea because many computers can check the complete spec monitoring, like Datadog, New Relic and Dynatrace. Hence… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    74
    Comparisons
    49
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    827
    Rating
    8.1
    Unranked
    In Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Hitachi JP1/Operations Analytics
    Learn More
    Overview

    Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

    Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

    JP1/Operations Analytics investigates and analyzes, from various angles, the failures that might occur in IT systems that have been consolidated via the use of virtual environments and cloud services. You can use the provided tools to speed up system recovery. JP1/Operations Analytics automatically detects the applications, servers, switches, storage devices, and other managed components that make up the IT infrastructure, and then visualizes the associations between the components and the business systems that use them. As a result, when a failure occurs, you can quickly assess the impact of the failure on business systems categorized by importance and then determine an appropriate initial response based on the importance of each business system. In addition, JP1/Operation Analytics displays a list of components as candidates for analysis or other response measures, simplifying the way in which failures are handled and supporting your company's entire failure-response procedure, from investigation to recovery.

      Sample Customers
      Information Not Available
      Top Industries
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Educational Organization56%
      Financial Services Firm11%
      Computer Software Company9%
      Retailer4%
      No Data Available
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business33%
      Midsize Enterprise8%
      Large Enterprise58%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business9%
      Midsize Enterprise57%
      Large Enterprise34%
      No Data Available
      Buyer's Guide
      Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
      April 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Nexthink, Lakeside Software, Riverbed and others in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM). Updated: April 2024.
      769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Catchpoint is ranked 5th in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) with 12 reviews while Hitachi JP1 Operations Analytics [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM). Catchpoint is rated 8.2, while Hitachi JP1 Operations Analytics [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Catchpoint writes "The UI is well designed, so it's easy to get the visibility you want". On the other hand, Catchpoint is most compared with Dynatrace, ThousandEyes, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and AppDynamics, whereas Hitachi JP1 Operations Analytics [EOL] is most compared with .

      We monitor all Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.