We performed a comparison between Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] and Jamf Pro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about JAMF, Microsoft, Kandji and others in Mobile Device Management (MDM)."The most valuable feature in Centrify is the ability to authenticate in a Linux environment, because this is what my customers were looking for. They are coming from a Linux environment, so they appreciate the identity and access management for allowing Linux workloads to authenticate securely."
"The self-service portal to share scripts and other tasks that have extremely minimized the need for calls to our support teams, or even sharing the applications we package and allowing users to pick and choose what apps they need or want, instead of just blanket installing everything from our old environment."
"We can put certain devices into smart groups based off of device name, department, etc."
"It's a scalable product."
"We have been able to keep our tech department lean and mean, maximizing our efficiency by utilizing Jamf to set up our iPads for us, rather than installing each app one at a time."
"The ease of use and access allows us to manage all of our devices collaboratively."
"Jamf Pro has allowed us to make sure settings for our devices are easily installed so our end-users don't need to worry about a significant amount of steps for setup. We also use this to send applications to devices."
"We are able to manage our full fleet of devices and can simply integrate with all of our systems."
"It's a great way to keep track of all of our licenses and the software we use daily."
"What can be improved in Centrify is the integration between the on-premise environment, specifically for Linux environments with the cloud infrastructure, such as Microsoft as it was during my time as a solution architect."
"We would love to see the ability to have settings apply to mobile devices on a time schedule. This would allow us to plan some tasks ahead of time."
"This solution would benefit from more focus on Self Service, such as Office 365 and GSuite integration."
"Jamf Pro currently is only used on Mac computers and could improve by having compatibility with other operating systems. We have to use other tools to manage our Windows and Android devices. There could be other improvements but I am still exploring and learning more about the features."
"The solution should offer beta testing for new products."
"The on-going improvements & innovation that Jamf provides over time is something that needs to be maintained, as it is what is needed to fulfill a business & team need at the right time."
"There are known issues with the mobile configs that need to be fixed."
"The upgrade process of this solutions could be improved. It is not possible to use Jamf Pro to upgrade devices."
"Training should be more accessible and cheaper."
Earn 20 points
Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Device Management (MDM) while Jamf Pro is ranked 1st in Mobile Device Management (MDM) with 103 reviews. Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Jamf Pro is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] writes "Has system multi-factor authentication abilities but is lacking connection between on-premise and cloud-based solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jamf Pro writes "Customizable with a self-service portal and a good security posture". Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Jamf Pro is most compared with Microsoft Intune, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl and Microsoft Configuration Manager.
See our list of best Mobile Device Management (MDM) vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Device Management (MDM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.