We performed a comparison between Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] and Jamf Pro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about JAMF, Microsoft, Kandji and others in Mobile Device Management (MDM)."The most valuable feature in Centrify is the ability to authenticate in a Linux environment, because this is what my customers were looking for. They are coming from a Linux environment, so they appreciate the identity and access management for allowing Linux workloads to authenticate securely."
"Jamf Pro allowed us to patch and manage endpoints while collecting log data to help improve operational efficiency."
"The most valuable features are the restrictions, Lost Mode, Self Service, and full implementation of anything Apple will let MDM manage."
"Jamf is stable, reliable, secure and you have lots of customization options."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to manage all devices through Apple's DEP and forcing them into Jamf pre-stage enrollment."
"Jamf has made it achievable for us to easily deploy & manage Apple devices anywhere in the world, without the need for hands-on assistance from IT staff."
"Configuration Profiles from Jamf Pro are awesome."
"Self Service empowers the user and allows them to install the software they need when they need it."
"The DEP enrollment is quite good. We're planning to migrate to the Jamf cloud this month."
"What can be improved in Centrify is the integration between the on-premise environment, specifically for Linux environments with the cloud infrastructure, such as Microsoft as it was during my time as a solution architect."
"I think there's room for improvement on the automation. For example, uploading a package to Jamf Pro and then updating the policy and other aspects, should be automatic. For instance, if I put a new version of the software, version 11 and the previous one was 10, Jamf Pro should be able to recognize if there's an update and update the policy automatically. It's not a big deal, but I think there's room for improvement."
"The dashboard needs to be customizable."
"Every once in a blue moon, we wind up with a rarely-seen superbug that takes support weeks to months to solve."
"It would be great if we get an email notification when the Mac users install any apps, so IT can be alerted."
"Currently, you need to scroll through pages and pages of icons (we have many icons that have been uploaded), and it can be tedious."
"It would be great for Jamf to provide templates for commonly used tasks like updating an operating system, packaging commonly used apps like Office 365, or enabling FileVault."
"We would like to have some of the extension attributes configured so that those extension attributes can be part of the core structure. They can make some of the extension attributes the actual attributes. They shouldn't be like add-ons."
"I wish the inventory would have its own pane without having to do it as a search."
Earn 20 points
Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Device Management (MDM) while Jamf Pro is ranked 1st in Mobile Device Management (MDM) with 103 reviews. Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Jamf Pro is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] writes "Has system multi-factor authentication abilities but is lacking connection between on-premise and cloud-based solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jamf Pro writes "Customizable with a self-service portal and a good security posture". Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Jamf Pro is most compared with Microsoft Intune, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl and Microsoft Configuration Manager.
See our list of best Mobile Device Management (MDM) vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Device Management (MDM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.