Compare Check Point NGFW vs. Juniper SRX

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco ASA Firewall Logo
70,706 views|51,770 comparisons
Check Point NGFW Logo
5,297 views|3,757 comparisons
Juniper SRX Logo
22,783 views|18,322 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Shashidhara B N
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point NGFW vs. Juniper SRX and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"At this point, we find that this product has high productivity and high availability and there is no need for improvement.""It is a highly stable product. We rarely receive any serious outdates, so it works quite well.""It is a secure product.""It is scalable and stable.""Cisco ASA is very strong.""It protects our network.""The stability of the product is good.""It is a comprehensive suite and complete package."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the IPsec VPN.""The Smart Dashboard and other user interfaces are very easy to use and can be handled without any significant IT skills.""After introducing this NGFW, we have improved our security posture, and now, have peace of mind.""It is easy to configure and it is a valuable antivirus protection. I especially like the IPS feature of this product.""We never had an outage of the appliances or the consoles. Stability is very strong. I never had a problem related to stability.""We use Check Point to complete the network compliance rules.""The initial setup was very straightforward. You can customize it and change it as you need.""The solution is easy to use. I like the monitoring the most."

More Check Point NGFW Pros »

"From a protection perspective, it provides a network perimeter security function for our company.""It protects from distributed denial-of-service attacks with Screen Options.""Most of our clients use it as a traditional firewall, blocking Layer 3 and Layer 4, blocking by transport.""The virtualization feature is the most valuable feature. Sometimes customers are requesting a private connection using mobile data when they are connecting to remote sites.""On a scale from one to ten, one being the worst and ten being the best I'd give Juniper SRX an overall rating of eight because of its' competitive price.""There is a lot of flexibility in how you can commit, check, and back out of a configuration.""The most valuable feature is the virtualization because it can be used for customers who are using the mobile data network to request a private connection to a remote site.""The deployment is quite easy and fast."

More Juniper SRX Pros »

Cons
"<p>If there is old hardware, or appliances, it does not necessarily work with the new Cisco generation firewalls.""It is not easy to configure.""The scalability is a bit limiting, to be honest. In terms of when you look to changing landscape in terms of threats, I think to me, my personal it's a bit limiting.""Tech support could not answer all of our questions. I had to do research on the web to solve my issues.""Migration with other appliances is not easy. It has to be done manually, and this takes a long time.""The pricing is a bit high.""Cisco ASA should be easier to use. It is a bit tough to navigate and see what is going on.""Even on a smaller scale, people are finding you need HA pairs, and there's no way that the ASA can do that, at least in the virtual version."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Cons »

"Check Point Smart Dashboard does not support my Apple MacBook Air. It only supports Windows versions.""The presentation of the reports need to be more user-friendly.""I would like for them to develop the ability to manage a cloud firewall with the same console. That would be very helpful.""This product has room for improvement in technical support for Africa.""Although they have it now, we don't have a license for it, and I think mobile device security should be a standard feature. I cannot control someone bringing their device to my network and what they do.""All the advanced features of automation, especially the first installation of tunnels, need improvement.""Reporting has to be improved.""One of the biggest disappointments is the GUI."

More Check Point NGFW Cons »

"This solution needs to update for "Next Generation" needs.""The GUI needs to be easier and more helpful for users who don't have security experience.""it would be more powerful if Juniper brought out a security product other than the firewall, like anti-spam, endpoint protection, etc. Customers who want to deploy security solutions are not just thinking about firewalls... Juniper should have an end-to-end solution, from the endpoint to the network level.""The Juniper SRX product needs to improve in terms of innovation.""Improvements can be made to the GUI. The GUI can be improved by creating policies to handle IPS requirements. The configuration should be a one-step process. This would make it easier to complete the setup to register the time of operation.""It's a good stable firewall, but it's nowhere near what it needs to be for a next-generation type firewall.""The Juniper product has to improve in terms of innovation.""The GUI needs improvement."

More Juniper SRX Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cost is a bit higher than other competitive solutions on the market.""It is considered on the "high end" of the spectrum.""Cisco recently has become very expensive.""The cost is a bit high compared to other solutions in the market.""Purchasing from the AWS Marketplace was easy. It was just point and click.""It is pay-as-you-go, so it much cheaper than buying in the plants.""Our individual release cycle has been quicker because the entire development and testing environment has been automated because of these virtual instances. It has aligned our development workflow. This is where we have seen the ROI increase.""With the Cisco ASA, you do get what you pay for. What would really be awesome is to see Cisco blow out a real cheap version where you can use the sandbox, but leave it step-wise and go to another product relatively easily, like getting you hooked on candy."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price is high in comparison to other solutions.""We pay $5,000-$6,000 a year.""Maybe the pricing is a bit high but you get the durability and the duration.""Licensing issues may be confusing at times.""It is quite an expensive product, although security is a top priority.""This product is not cheap and there are additional costs that depend on what model or package that you buy.""Palo Alto is somehow not as good as Check Point, budget-wise and performance-wise. Palo Alto is more costly than Check Point.""Comparatively, Check Point pricing is a little high. However, if you have that budget, I would recommend anybody to go with Check Point."

More Check Point NGFW Pricing and Cost Advice »

"In terms of pricing, Juniper is in the middle. The most expensive firewall is Palo Alto. If a customer wants the cheapest price they should go for FortiGate. Juniper is in between these products.""The direct support with Juniper is expensive. When you stop using the solution and miss one year of payments, if you want the support back on a specific node, they ask you to pay for the year that you haven't used the node.""The pricing is perhaps half, probably forty percent, of Cisco.""While the price of support is expensive, the price of the solution, itself, is not.""The price of this solution is more than other products, but it's stable, and the technical support is better than I have seen with others.""There was no additional licensing cost because there were no IPS services. It was just a firewall IP circuit router so they have the default licensing. We just need to renew the support yearly.""Compared to other vendors, the pricing of this solution is good."

More Juniper SRX Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Fortinet FGs: Great devices, relatively easy to deploy and maintain. Cheaper than most devices of their kind. If you're… more »
Top Answer: They provide DDoS protection and multi-factor authentication. That is a good option as it enables work-from-home… more »
Top Answer: In terms of costs, other solutions are more expensive than Cisco. Palo Alto is more expensive than Cisco.
Top Answer: Centralised dashboard for all checkpoints gateway with options of copying policy from 1 gateway to another  Providing… more »
Top Answer: Licensing issues may be confusing at times.
Top Answer: Need to have some options for configuring firewall policy based on Zone. As it allows creating Flat policy and explicit… more »
Top Answer: The EEE security controls allow us to make policy restrictions, so I can customize port numbers to allow or limit… more »
Top Answer: When we first tested the serial interface on our model, it did not work. It should be easier to escalate support… more »
Top Answer: We use Juniper for EEE routing and we also use the gateway feature.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Firewall, Cisco ASA NGFW, Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA, Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls, Cisco ASAvCheck Point NG Firewall, Check Point Next Generation FirewallSRX
Learn
Cisco
Check Point
Juniper
Overview

Cisco ASA firewalls deliver enterprise-class firewall functionality with highly scalable and flexible VPN capabilities to meet diverse needs, from small/branch offices to high performance data centers and service providers. Available in a wide range of models, Cisco ASA can be deployed as a physical or virtual appliance. Flexible VPN capabilities include support for remote access, site-to-site, and clientless VPN. Also, select appliances support clustering for increased performance, VPN load balancing to optimize available resources, advanced high availability configurations, and more.

Cisco ASAv is the virtualized version of the Cisco ASA firewall. Widely deployed in leading private and public clouds, Cisco ASAv is ideal for remote worker and multi-tenant environments. The solution scales up/down to meet performance requirements and high availability provides resilience. Also, Cisco ASAv can deliver micro-segmentation to protect east-west network traffic.

Cisco firewalls provide consistent security policies, enforcement, and protection across all your environments. Unified management for Cisco ASA and FTD/NGFW physical and virtual firewalls is delivered by Cisco Defense Orchestrator (CDO), with cloud logging also available. And with Cisco SecureX included with every Cisco firewall, you gain a cloud-native platform experience that enables greater simplicity, visibility, and efficiency.

Learn more about Cisco’s firewall solutions, including virtual appliances for public and private cloud.

Offered via the Check Point Infinity architecture, Check Point’s NGFW includes 23 Firewall models optimized for running all threat prevention technologies simultaneously, including full SSL traffic inspection, without compromising on security or performance. Learn More about Next Generation Firewall and What is Firewall?

High-performance security with advanced, integrated threat intelligence, delivered on the industry's most scalable and resilient platform. SRX Series gateways set new benchmarks with 100GbE interfaces and feature Express Path technology, which enables up to 1 Tbps performance for the data center.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco ASA Firewall
Learn more about Check Point NGFW
Learn more about Juniper SRX
Sample Customers
There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.Control Southern, Optimal Media7-Eleven, AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, alltours GmbH, Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Atlantech Online, Availity, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BancABC, BAS Group, Black Lotus, Blue Box, Borealis, Carilion Clinic, Catholic Health System, CATV, Champlain College, Chinas Ministry of Railways, China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT), Cloud Dynamics, CloudSeeds, Cloudwatt, CODONiS, Colt Technology Services, Cork Internet Exchange, CSS Versicherung AG, CyrusOne, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Department of Energy, Divona Telecom, DQE Communications, DreamHost, European Government Agency, Expedient, Financial Market Information Services Provider, Fluidata, Fonality, Fox Sports, Global Financial Institution, Global Investment Bank, Global Investment Company, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), Goethe University, HEAnet, High Performance Networks Inc., Hillenbrand
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company9%
University7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider26%
Media Company6%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm26%
Computer Software Company14%
Retailer9%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider21%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
Insurance Company6%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider56%
Financial Services Firm17%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
University6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider33%
Computer Software Company30%
Media Company7%
K 12 Educational Company Or School4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise41%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise48%
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise58%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise32%
Large Enterprise55%
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise42%
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point NGFW vs. Juniper SRX and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Check Point NGFW is ranked 4th in Firewalls with 56 reviews while Juniper SRX is ranked 11th in Firewalls with 17 reviews. Check Point NGFW is rated 8.6, while Juniper SRX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Check Point NGFW writes "Central architecture means we can see an end-to-end picture of attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper SRX writes "This best in class Next-Gen firewall is elegant in its ease-of-use and architecture". Check Point NGFW is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Azure Firewall, Meraki MX , OPNsense and Palo Alto Networks VM-Series, whereas Juniper SRX is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, pfSense, Meraki MX and Palo Alto Networks VM-Series. See our Check Point NGFW vs. Juniper SRX report.

See our list of best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.