We performed a comparison between Check Point NGFW and Juniper SRX Series Firewall based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Check Point NGFW is highly recommended for its extensive security features, convenient centralized management, and impressive virtualization capabilities. Juniper SRX Series Firewall is well-known for its user-friendly interface, effortless usage, and excellent support.
Check Point should focus on improving integration, upgrading hardware, reducing costs, and enhancing stability. Juniper needs to work on capacity scalability, pricing strategy, reporting capabilities, user interface, device reliability, and feature enhancements.
Service and Support: The customer service for Check Point NGFW has garnered varying opinions, with some customers finding it helpful and responsive, while others believe there is room for improvement. Juniper SRX Series Firewall's customer service is generally deemed satisfactory, with customers appreciating its helpfulness and knowledge. However, there have been occasions where response times were slower and the need for escalation arose.
Ease of Deployment: Check Point NGFW's initial setup can be complex and may need expertise and experience for specific configurations and migrations. Juniper SRX Series Firewall generally has a simple setup process, although it may require CLI experience and coordination with the vendor.
Pricing: Check Point NGFW is known for its expensive setup cost, particularly when compared to other options. Users have found the process of adding new licensing to existing devices to be complex, especially for larger enterprise-level devices. Juniper SRX Series Firewall offers a more reasonable and affordable setup cost. Its setup process is straightforward, and the pricing is considered reasonable.
ROI: Check Point NGFW offers cost savings, simplicity, and effective security enforcement, providing peace of mind once the protection level is understood. Juniper SRX Series Firewall is a valuable investment, delivering positive returns and enhanced security features.
Comparison Results: Based on the review answers, the Check Point NGFW is preferred over the Jun SRX Series Firewall. Check Point NGFW offers comprehensive security features such as URL filtering, intrusion prevention systems, identity and access management, and application control capabilities. It also provides centralized management and virtualization features, stability, ease of use, and scalability. Despite its higher pricing, Check Point NGFW is considered more reliable and secure. Additionally, its customer service and support are generally satisfactory.
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"The solution is scalable."
"Their reliability and their policy of pre-shipping replacements when a unit has failed."
"I like that you are able to manage FortiGate from the FortiManager to create a more centralized environment."
"FortiGate has a strong security topic which allows all of the Fortinet devices to communicate and share information which makes their security more powerful."
"It blocks the vulnerabilities that can negatively impact us."
"The response is very quick and they can visually resolve our problems in a short period."
"Reliability is the best feature. We faced some issues when we were setting it up, but the service, portal, and administration are good."
"The best feature is the ability to increase the capacity of the solution by exactly what you add, not losing anything for High Availability."
"Everything can be managed from a single dashboard nowadays."
"Check Point NGFW has helped the company in the prevention of cyber attacks that could affect operations and slow down production."
"The features that are important include: IPS, sandbox, SandBlast, Anti-Bot, and URL filtering."
"Apart from it having very good features, I personally like the vulnerability assistance via report management which detects host and network vulnerability."
"Some of the most valuable features are URL filtering, web filtering, and content filtering."
"Check Point offers virtualized systems, making it easy to scale."
"On the firewall side, the security efficacy is good."
"You can scale the solution."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper SRX is that it is plug-and-play. Additionally, it has a lot of capabilities in one device."
"The solution has been good for fulfilling our basic needs."
"We think they have a good interface, the operating system is good, it's robust. It has plenty of great features, and the relation between the cost and benefits works for our business."
"It integrates well with Fortinet and Palo Alto."
"When compared to Palo Alto, Juniper is a better choice when it comes to the enterprise network and connectivity."
"The high availability of the application is good."
"The deployment is quite easy and fast."
"We sometimes have issues with FortiGate's routing table in the latest firmware update. We had to downgrade the device because our customers complained about bugs."
"There aren't really any negative aspects to discuss."
"I would like to see improvements in the product's application rules."
"It needs to improve its ISP load balancing."
"The solution lacks multi-language support."
"The Web-filter in this solution is not very good."
"Lacks training for new features."
"Tunnel flapping was one of the major things I had seen wherein your internet link remains but your VPN tunnel is down. However, since I got a fix from the TAC team, I have not noticed it, but the customer complained a few times that they couldn't access the internet because of this problem."
"It should be user-friendly from an implementation point of view. Its setup is a little bit difficult."
"The speed of technical support is very slow and is something that should be improved."
"I would highlight the need for enhancements in technical support services."
"There should be better integration with our current NAC solution to increase the granularity of policies that we implement."
"One of the most complicated aspects is the VPN Configuration, which should be simplified in future releases."
"One of the biggest disappointments is the GUI."
"Initially, we faced a few challenges with firmware. Later this was addressed with jumbo hotfixes."
"The current model is predominantly hardware appliance-based, which can incur substantial costs"
"It could have features that other products support like blade options and stand-alone endpoint security."
"In terms of other features, I'd like to see a web filter, 10 point control, application control and a DNA filter in the next release."
"The GUI needs to be easier to handle."
"I would like to see endpoint control and endpoint testing security."
"The solution is quite advanced. You need a lot of training to use it effectively."
"The CLI is verbose. You have to say a lot to do a little. I don't like that part of it. Cisco's command syntax seems to be a good bit more concise. When you're trying to get something done, you don't want to have to type a bunch."
"In the next release, I would like to have a better web interface. It needs to be more user-friendly. Right now, you can only access many features through the console."
"Third-party support for Juniper is a lot less than Cisco. This is no surprise, but a definite consideration if you are expecting to use a lot of third party support. In my guesstimate, for every 100 Cisco shops, you will find one Juniper shop."
Check Point NGFW is ranked 5th in Firewalls with 275 reviews while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is ranked 19th in Firewalls with 86 reviews. Check Point NGFW is rated 8.8, while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Check Point NGFW writes "Good antivirus protection and URL filtering with very good user identification capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper SRX Series Firewall writes "Highly scalable, user-friendly UI, and easy to maintain". Check Point NGFW is most compared with Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, Sophos XG, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense and Meraki MX, whereas Juniper SRX Series Firewall is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Netgate pfSense, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Meraki MX. See our Check Point NGFW vs. Juniper SRX Series Firewall report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors and best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.