We performed a comparison between Check Point Pointsec [EOL] and Sophos SafeGuard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Endpoint Encryption."Full disk encryption helps us ensure that data stored on a device is encrypted."
"At the time when this tool was launched on the market, it had new technologies integrated within."
"Check Point GAiA is easy to use."
"One of the characteristics that give us the most value is that it offers the ability to perform HTTPS inspections."
"The monitoring features are easy to use."
"It's a straightforward solution."
"I like that Sophos SafeGuard provides excellent technical support."
"The malware protection and the scanning features are most valuable in this solution."
"It's quite easy to integrate Safeguard with BitLocker"
"SafeGuard's best feature is its stability."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the GUI is easy to use."
"The solution has a great VPN."
"The UI was one of the most difficult points to get used to. Due to the UI, even though it was used every day, the administration was complicated."
"We would maybe want (in the future) advanced security in the filtering of access to the metaverse by augmented reality cameras."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see application identity support."
"The installation was quite complex."
"The solution is not using other features like booting encryption, because it causes very heavy processing of the workstation. If they could find some way to handle the encryption and decryption to be lighter on the workstation it would be better."
"The product's next release could have integration features with different internal and external systems."
"Sophos should conduct some seminars to teach people how to use it and also to inform the users about what they should do in case of problems."
"SafeGuard's user interface is ugly and doesn't provide reports, so we have to go into the database and get information from there by creating queries."
"I would like to see a support-cloud, where Sophos creates a single package that contains all of its products."
"Having a DLP integrated with the encryption engine would be very good."
"The integration could be a little better."
"There are times that this solution takes up too much memory that needs to be resolved. If it is not fixed it will definitely create issues in the future."
Earn 20 points
Check Point Pointsec [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Endpoint Encryption with 4 reviews while Sophos SafeGuard is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Encryption with 36 reviews. Check Point Pointsec [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Sophos SafeGuard is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Pointsec [EOL] writes "Very good disk encryption, secure authentication, and centralized administration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos SafeGuard writes "Stable solution that preserves data confidentiality". Check Point Pointsec [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Sophos SafeGuard is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption, ESET Endpoint Encryption, Cisco Secure Endpoint and McAfee Complete Data Protection.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors and best Mobile Data Protection vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
