We performed a comparison between Sophos SafeGuard and Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Encryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Integration with other solutions is one of its strongest points. It's very easy to integrate and automate."
"The intrusion detection system."
"The monitoring features are easy to use."
"The features that I have found most valuable are encryption tools that encrypt the hard disk and the USB sticks."
"It is one of the best products when it comes to stability."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the GUI is easy to use."
"The product filters phishing emails."
"The solution can be easily connected and it is very secure."
"Very good interface."
"Trend Micro provides good overall protection. It has saved us from a few attacks and malware."
"Overall, I think that it's very interesting."
"We're very satisfied with Trend Micro support."
"Offers very good endpoint security solutions."
"The encryption is very good."
"Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption has good performance and is secure."
"Encryption is the basic feature, and that is what I like about it. I also like that it is kind of easy to install and easy to configure."
"As a tool, Sophos SafeGuard is not optimized."
"Sophos SafeGuard cannot block or quarantine such viruses. Quarantine is a feature with shortcomings that needs improvement."
"The integration could be a little better."
"Sometimes, multiple updates and crashes happen in the tool, making it an area where improvements are required."
"Technical support could be a bit better."
"There's no centralized management. This is a drawback."
"The dashboards lack sufficient information."
"The product is not cheap."
"We had to use an integrator for the implementation of Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption. We have two people who work on this solution."
"The product's scalability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"They need to come up with cloud solutions."
"To improve Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption, the user interface could be somewhat more friendly. It is already friendly, but it can not be approached through to the exact issue and just to give you the full detail of each and every port graphically."
"In the next release, it would be better if it was more user-friendly. It is a little complicated for the average technical person. If they can make it more user-friendly, it would be much easier and more helpful."
"It is not easy to integrate with third party solutions."
"Support from them was not fast."
"I would like to see more integration. Good cloud-based solutions need to be arrayed. I'd like to see better integration with administrative tools as well as Active Directory integration."
More Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption Pricing and Cost Advice →
Sophos SafeGuard is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Encryption with 35 reviews while Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption is ranked 4th in Endpoint Encryption with 20 reviews. Sophos SafeGuard is rated 8.4, while Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Sophos SafeGuard writes "Stable solution that preserves data confidentiality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption writes "Used for mobile device protection with moderate pricing". Sophos SafeGuard is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, ESET Endpoint Encryption, Cisco Secure Endpoint and McAfee Complete Data Protection, whereas Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint and McAfee Complete Data Protection. See our Sophos SafeGuard vs. Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
