We performed a comparison between Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"You can use it from anywhere."
"For our company's needs, AnyConnect is sufficient and very easy to use."
"This solution is stable. There have been no technical issues."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"Some of the main features of the solution are it has the ability to integrate with our Active Directory to allow each user to have one less password to have to remember and it has great functionality."
"The system is reliable, simple and secure."
"Support does solve our issues."
"Configuration policy, posture assessment, and other things can be done in great detail."
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"I would like a faster connection from the solution."
"The cost could always be a bit less."
"We'd like the product to be cheaper."
"The setup is a bit difficult to handle on the server-side."
"There are situations where the connection drops, and you may not even be aware of it until you try to do something critical."
"They can redesign the reset password, reset function, and user interface."
"The solution could offer tighter integration with endpoint protection to make it easier to use when routing security applications from other vendors."
"There are some issues with connectivity and latency that should be improved."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
More Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 69 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 44th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is rated 8.6, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client writes "A stable solution that helps users connect to resources when working from home". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Check Point Remote Access VPN and Fortinet FortiClient, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.