Most Helpful Review
Provides a secure mechanism for remote access. However, they are not ready for managed security services.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Among the top features are integrated threat defence and the fact that each virtual appliance is separate so you get great granular control.
The transparency of the single UI to ensure security. A product has to be simple so that an administrator can use it.
The integration and configuration were pretty straightforward.
It is a comprehensive suite and complete package.
Content Filtering and sandboxing are valuable features.
Anti-Spam reduces unwanted mail on corporate exchange services.
Content filtering reduces the load on the available bandwidth and restricts employees from using distracting websites on the job, which leads to more productive hours.
It has good reporting, the reporting is marvelous.
Support is usually good when it comes to helping with issues.
Valuable features include a web filter, DHCP, and monitoring capabilities.
It allows us to block applications, i.e., websites by application type category. It is far more capable than content filtering alone.
Support has improved dramatically since their separation from Dell.
There are always vulnerabilities that come up and there was one in early 2018 but this was patched with software updates.
The artificial intelligence and machine learning (behavioral based threat detection), which I can this will be coming out in another year, these are what we need now.
Even on a smaller scale, people are finding you need HA pairs, and there's no way that the ASA can do that, at least in the virtual version.
Cisco ASA should be easier to use. It is a bit tough to navigate and see what is going on.
The only thing that we would want would be single-pane management, which it has, but the GMS is not very good. It's purely the management of multiple devices for multiple customers, that's the only thing that it's lacking.
After-sales support and hands-on training facilities are not available in my country.
The problem primarily with SonicWall is it's a Unix box. And it's all software, all the activities, blocking, censoring, everything has to happen in the software. If you start hitting the box with a lot of sessions it slows down and that's not what I expect from a firewall.
It's very hard to manage this box. You really need a lot of skills to operate the SonicWall. There is training and the like, but it's just hard to manage. Even if you have the knowledge, there are too many options. The menus are not very clear, where you should find the information.
Port forwarding could use streamlining.
It is very modular and with native resources which are much lower than its competitors.
The anti-spam requires a specific Java version on the server side (do not update it, otherwise it will break).
They are not ready for managed security services. Their Cloud GMS product is weak, barely out of beta (buggy).
Pricing and Cost Advice
We are partners with Cisco. They are always one call away, which is good. They know how to keep their customers happy.
With the Cisco ASA, you do get what you pay for. What would really be awesome is to see Cisco blow out a real cheap version where you can use the sandbox, but leave it step-wise and go to another product relatively easily, like getting you hooked on candy.
Purchasing from the AWS Marketplace was easy. It was just point and click.
It is pay-as-you-go, so it much cheaper than buying in the plants.
Our individual release cycle has been quicker because the entire development and testing environment has been automated because of these virtual instances. It has aligned our development workflow. This is where we have seen the ROI increase.
Additional resources are too expensive.
Licensed features provide application control, content filtering, antivirus, and anti-malware all in a single appliance.
The CPUs are not able to compete with a similar price point to the Fortinet, WatchGuard, or Palo Alto product.
A firewall doing anti-spam might be a low cost solution, but it is not your best strategy.
You need their analyzer to properly generate reports. This is an expensive, licensed feature, with a complex application or appliance back-end.
out of 48 in Firewalls
out of 48 in Firewalls
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
|Adaptive Security Virtual Appliance||NSA 250M, NSA 2600, NSA 3600, NSA 4600, NSA 5600, Dell SonicWALL NSA|
|Achieve a deeper level of security with the SonicWALL Network Security Appliance (NSA) Series of next-generation firewalls. NSA Series appliances integrate automated and dynamic security capabilities into a single platform, combining the patented, SonicWALL Reassembly Free Deep Packet Inspection (RFDPI) firewall engine with a powerful, massively scalable, multi-core architecture. Now you can block even the most sophisticated threats with an intrusion prevention system (IPS) featuring advanced anti-evasion capabilities, SSL decryption and inspection, and network-based malware protection that leverages the power of the cloud.|
Learn more about Cisco ASAv
Learn more about SonicWall NSA
|Bluelock||Orange County Rescue Mission, First Source, Michaels & Taylor, Green Clinic Health System, Aspire Chiltern Skills and Enterprise Centre, UnitedStack, Faith Lutheran College Redlands, Celtic Manor Resort, Star Kay White, Air Works, Unimat Life, NHS Yorkshire and Humber Commissioning Support (YHCS), Hutt City Council, Mato Grosso do Sul, Nspyre|
No Data Available
Writing And Editing Position29%