Compare Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Cisco Enterprise Routers

Cisco Cloud Services Router is ranked 4th in Routers with 10 reviews while Cisco Enterprise Routers is ranked 1st in Routers with 15 reviews. Cisco Cloud Services Router is rated 7.4, while Cisco Enterprise Routers is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Cloud Services Router writes "´╗┐It connects all my environments together in a smart, efficient way. However, they could make the pricing cheaper". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Enterprise Routers writes "An expensive solution that does not live up to expectations for performance". Cisco Cloud Services Router is most compared with , whereas Cisco Enterprise Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, HPE Enterprise Routers and Huawei Enterprise Routers. See our Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Cisco Enterprise Routers report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Cisco Enterprise Routers and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is the SNMP traps that I use to monitor the router and the availability of the network.The most important feature is that it is designed for mobile vehicle communication in harsh conditions.It provides peace of mind because it is a stable product that you aren't going to lose sleep over at night wondering if it will be running or not.It integrates well with the other products we're using. We have it with multiple windows like Palo Alto, Arista and it easily integrated with them.It allowed us to create a more secure VPN than we would have been able to do without it.It handles stress very well. We have not reached a point of needing to worry about its capabilities.It seems pretty stable. We have never had any issues with it.It connects all the accounts with the weaknesses, and this is what we were looking for. Also, it connects with the on-premise side.

Read more »

They offer a variety of very good features.The product can help teach valuable life lessons about what not to do when building a network.The stability of the solution's router is its most valuable feature.The most valuable features are security and throughput.The solution is very stable. I have not seen any downtime due to the product freezing or anything like that. It performs well and hasn't required reboots unless it's to troubleshoot with a support service provider needing configuration. It doesn't overheat and it's on 24/7.The most valuable features of this solution are MPLS, BGP, and VRF.The VPN is the most valuable feature of this solution. The basic clients who don't use the VPN use it mostly for connectivity.The routing feature is the solution's most valuable aspect.

Read more »

Cons
You can use this router in a scalable solution but it has its limitations.I would like to see better security, where there are more access controls and data confidentiality.I would like the ability to moderate between devices on-premise to off-premise. This would be a vast improvement.They have an online registration that happens after they pick up block months. If they could decrease to yearly or something, sometimes the device is not cell phone accessible. That becomes an issue or challenge for us. If that can be improved, that would be really great.It is too complex. It is not easy to set up, even with the documentation that they provided. It is a little confusing.The ease of use within the AWS environment needs to improve. Sometimes, it is very esoteric in how you use it. Therefore, you have to learn to use it, then you are able to.I would like some deployment examples and guides specific to AWS VPCs and how to separate your subnets. Then, how they tie-in with the Internet gateway and any NAT services that we are running on our VPC. This would be extremely helpful.It does the job, but it's not cloud native. It could be even better, like having a single pane of glass and being less expensive.

Read more »

The pricing of the solution needs improvement.Many things about this solution are problematic including setup, configuration, performance, upgrades and support.The configuration needs improvement. Most routers, like HP or Aruba, use a UI interface. Those solutions are similar and uniform. It's easier for us compared to Cisco because with Cisco you are not using normal commands. They need to enhance the UI to make it more usable.This solution is scalable but it does need some improvements.If I only have one LAN port in which I want to connect more than one device, I have to buy an add-on card so that I can have two LAN ports. The smaller devices and low-end routers have about four LAN ports. This solution is a high-end device but has only one. It would be preferable if they offered more LAN ports.I would like to see the setup time reduced.The pricing could be improved.The solution needs to offer some security features in a future release.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The pricing is good for what it offers.Purchasing the product on the AWS Marketplace was very simplistic. Our organization was trying to centralize our billing costs, and simplicity was best.The pricing is fine, though it might have been cheaper going through a partner or doing a direct buy.Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was easy; click a button and you have it.The cost needs improvement. It is very expensive through the AWS Marketplace.The price is a little high, more than what we wanted to pay. This is one area where we would like to understanding how the price could be brought down a bit more.Purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace was very simple. We went through the AWS Marketplace because it was the easiest way to get the product up and running very quickly.The should make the Dynamic Multipoint VPN solution more affordable.

Read more »

The product is very expensive and does not provide the expected performance for the cost.The price of this solution is high.The cost of this solution is a little bit high compared to others.Cisco is mid-tier in terms of pricing and quite affordable by most enterprises.Our issues are basically currency related. The licensing is in dollars and the dollar is steadily rising. We've had an increase in the licensing fee due to the simple reason that the exchange rate is almost over 40%. That creates a major issue. If the currency devaluation doesn't stabilize, we may have to look at another solution.It is a costly solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Routers solutions are best for your needs.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
out of 11 in Routers
Views
500
Comparisons
6
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
499
Avg. Rating
7.4
1st
out of 11 in Routers
Views
4,785
Comparisons
4,016
Reviews
15
Average Words per Review
471
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco CSR, Cisco Cloud Services Router 1000v, Cisco CSR 1000v
Learn
Cisco
Video Not Available
Cisco
Overview

The Cisco Cloud Services Router 1000v (CSR 1000v) is a virtual-form-factor router that delivers comprehensive WAN gateway and network services functions into virtual and cloud environments. Using familiar, industry-leading Cisco IOS XE Software networking capabilities, the CSR 1000v enables enterprises to transparently extend their WANs into provider-hosted clouds. Similarly, cloud providers themselves can use it to offer enterprise-class networking services to their tenants or customers.

The high-performance Cisco Enterprise Routers are the market leader due to their breadth of advanced support for LAN/WAN services, redundancy, reliability, and performance.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco Cloud Services Router
Learn more about Cisco Enterprise Routers
Sample Customers
Under Armour, HealthSparq, AdobeAegean Motorway, Boingo, Chartwell School, Children's Hospital of Orange County , Department of Justice, Explorer Pipeline, Linz AG, National Rugby League, New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Telecom Italia, Transwestern
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Cisco Enterprise Routers and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.