We performed a comparison between Cleo Integration Cloud Platform and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of use it provides. Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is a straightforward and simple product."
"Mule Expression Language"
"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."
"The most valuable feature is the Salesforce integration."
"Easy connectivity and easy integration."
"This tool has exceptional API management and integration connectors in addition to multiple out of the box connectors."
"The most valuable feature is that it's programmer-friendly, so it's very easy to develop APIs."
"The product offers a community edition that is free of cost."
"The most powerful feature is DataWeave, which is a powerful language where data can be transformed from one form into another."
"Currently, the solution fails to provide users with additional protocol assistance and API integrations, so the aforementioned areas need to be considered for improvement."
"It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature."
"There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"The solution's setup needs to be a bit more straightforward and its support needs to respond faster."
"From the product perspective, it was sometimes hard to manage the dependencies. When we had to add dependencies on a couple of different packages, it was sometimes confusing. It was hard to update them with Anypoint Studio, as well as with MuleSoft. There were challenges with that. So, that's one of the areas that could be improved."
"The current version will not be supported for much longer."
"MuleSoft isn't as mature as some other integration technologies out there like IBM WebSphere. There's room for growth, and MuleSoft is working toward that."
"The Anypoint platform consumes a lot of memory, and it would be great for developers if it were more lightweight."
More Cleo Integration Cloud Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is ranked 13th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is rated 7.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cleo Integration Cloud Platform writes "Though the tool reduces the internal hosting cost for businesses, it needs to provide more API integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is most compared with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and IBM B2B Integrator, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, Red Hat Fuse and webMethods Integration Server.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
