We performed a comparison between IBM Integration Bus and Mule ESB based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Both solutions receive high marks from reviewers. IBM Integration Bus has a slight advantage over Mule ESB due to its flexibility and user-friendly interface.
"The most valuable features of the IBM Integration Bus are the flexibility to easily integrate with other solutions, such as SAP or any other vendors."
"IBM Integration Bus has a complete set of tools that are implemented between rules when it comes to run time, but it's not easy to understand."
"My favorite feature is the XML-based DFDL mapping, which is a tool that allows you to graphically map legacy data formats to modern data formats."
"IBM Integration Bus' most valuable features are its performance, fast and easy development, and easy support."
"It is very straightforward. It is very user-friendly integration."
"The most valuable thing is the loose coupling and making the change in only one stack of the ESB layer or the middleware layer."
"It's easy to develop things, and it's easy to handle."
"I consider the solution to be one of the most stable in the market."
"The solution has a good graphical interface."
"The connectors help to connect with a variety of applications."
"The setup is straightforward."
"The architecture based on events has several connectors which allow integration from external and internal applications of the company."
"The product offers a community edition that is free of cost."
"The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot."
"I'm not using ESB directly. It is the integration layer, so it's running under the hood. However, the conversion and transformation performance is excellent. Anypoint Enterprise Security is also solid."
"The solution doesn't require much code writing and we can develop APIs very easily."
"The cloud deployment of the IBM Integration Bus should be made easier."
"The password settings need improvement."
"Its integration with Cloud Pak components could be better."
"To scale virtically, is difficult."
"The solution could improve by having built-in implementation and secure monitoring without the need for API Connect."
"The solution is complex and there is a need for more resources and greatly improved quality."
"IBM Integration Bus could be easier to manage, but this is true of all vendors. It doesn't always do what it says on the box."
"The price could be better. It would also be better if they simplified the code."
"There are some issues with both stability and scalability."
"Mule ESB isn't as secure as IBM. Financial companies go with IBM for that reason."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
"The solution's setup needs to be a bit more straightforward and its support needs to respond faster."
"Mule ESB is more into the latest REST APIs, not much into the SOAP web services. Developing is all about web services and not easy with Mule."
"The current version will not be supported for much longer."
"One area that could be improved is the way that policies are propagated when APIs are moved from one environment to another. It's an issue, but when you develop and test the rest APIs in a lower environment and need to move them, there's a propagation process. This process moves certain aspects of the APIs, like the basic features. But when we move them, the policies don't always move with them. The policies should be able to move so we don't have to redo them manually. There are some APIs we use, but it's a bit tedious."
"We would like the ability to use our own code. This would allow us to develop customizations with ease. Additionally, it would be nice to have more analytics or insights on the exchanged information between databases."
IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 63 reviews while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with IBM WebSphere Message Broker, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server, IBM DataPower Gateway and Red Hat Fuse, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, Red Hat Fuse, webMethods Integration Server and IBM DataPower Gateway. See our IBM Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.