We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and CloverETL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Its documentation could be improved."
Earn 20 points
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while CloverETL is ranked 60th in Data Integration. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while CloverETL is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas CloverETL is most compared with iWay Universal Adapter Framework, Talend Open Studio and SSIS.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
