We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"The solution is scalable."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."
"The drag and drop functionality is quite good."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are."
"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
"The solution needs to be scalable."
"There is really nothing special about the capabilities of this product."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The product has some constraints and performance issues."
"Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 60th in Data Integration while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". CloverETL is most compared with iWay Universal Adapter Framework, Talend Open Studio and SSIS, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.