Code42 Incydr vs Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Code42 Incydr and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Code42 Incydr vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Security tools: Being able to monitor data going in and coming off our endpoints. Seeing what it is and where it's going is awesome.""Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer.""Low system overhead, setting retention policies, ease of use""t has a very user friendly status bar with common errors and has logs built in to the console so we can review the issues or status of CrashPlan.""The solution is very stable. Very rarely do we have any issues with it. We don't have to deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it to be reliable.""It has quite a bit of flexibility in configuring backup sets.""Works in the background and users are able to perform restores.""There are a couple of things. One of them is that they have what they call Incydr. Their detection and response solution to the insider threat area is called Incydr. That gives visibility to the clients that have widely dispersed employee bases due to work from home, or that had a dispersed workforce predating any of the work from home requirements. Even though they might not be inside the organization physically, they're inside the organization. It allows us to get some visibility into what people are doing, what the context is, and how to control what might be the potential for intellectual property theft or file exposure."

More Code42 Incydr Pros →

"The interface and dashboard are okay.""We use Trend Micro mainly to monitor user activities, such as tracking the websites they visit and purchase items. Additionally, we focus on identifying and addressing antivirus threats. We used to explore a feature related to proxy but decided against it as an enterprise solution wasn't readily available for us. Our primary use of Trend Micro revolves around end-user security. Integration with Active Directory has proven beneficial, allowing us to easily push updates or changes directly from the console.""We are able to check the log and keep records.""The most values feature of this solution are the micro DLP features.""There are no issues with the interface.""The basic setup, like configuring servers or deploying the SaaS platform and agent implementation, is straightforward.""It is a scalable product.""We find the initial setup to be very easy."

More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"Reporting could use an overhaul. It is very limited.""The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions.""In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue.""What I think could be improved is how I get support.""​Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products.""I think one we can improve is the compression.""I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin.""You can't always filter out data that you'd like to."

More Code42 Incydr Cons →

"Being able to specify an agent list, or client list, to allow support from outside of the organization, would be of benefit to this solution.""The platform's support structure for government-specific domain requirements could be improved.""They could improve the product's data loss policies.""The tool should improve its reporting functionality. We need a proper reporting feature in a DLP solution.""Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is buggy, which is one area for improvement. I also found Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention support horrible, so that's another area for improvement.""Needs a remote login option.""In Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, there is a need to improve the plug-in manager, as it is an area with shortcomings.""It's hard for me to answer any questions about missing features. It's the outside companies who support us that manage this DLP solution at this moment."

More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."
  • "It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."
  • "It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."
  • "The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."
  • "It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."
  • More Code42 Incydr Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing and pricing of Trend Micro are comparatively low and competitive since they are offered in a bundle, especially compared to Symantec, which was has a relatively high price."
  • "It's relatively cheap so the pricing is okay."
  • "The client needs to pay for the Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention license on an annual basis."
  • "Price-wise, it is a cheap solution. I rate the solution's pricing a two on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high."
  • "Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is expensive compared to other solutions."
  • "I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."
  • "The product is worth the money you pay for it. It is not an expensive solution."
  • "It's not too expensive, especially when compared to SecureTech, and Forcepoint. It's actually cheaper. A license costs about INR 4,000 to INR 5,000, roughly $60 per license per year. In comparison, Forcepoint licenses are around $90 to $95."
  • More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details.
    Top Answer:In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process… more »
    Top Answer:When I first became acquainted with Code42, we were implementing it at an employer I worked with, and that was a successful implementation. I now work for a consulting firm, and we do system… more »
    Top Answer:Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is a reliable product.
    Top Answer:The platform is expensive. We purchase its yearly license.
    Ranking
    Views
    633
    Comparisons
    464
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,697
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    2,037
    Comparisons
    705
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    499
    Rating
    6.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore
    Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention
    Learn More
    Overview

    Detect file exfiltration via web browsers, USB, cloud apps, email, file link sharing, Airdrop, and more. See how files are moved and shared across your entire organization – without the need for policies, proxies or plugins. Incydr automatically identifies when files move outside your trusted environment, allowing you to easily detect when files are sent to personal accounts and unmanaged devices.

    Incydr prioritizes file activity based on 120+ contextual Incydr Risk Indicators (IRIs). This prioritization works on day 1 without any configuration. Incydr’s risk scoring logic is use case-driven and transparent to administrators. Incydr uses Watchlists to programmatically protect data from employees who are most likely to leak or steal files, such as departing employees.

    Take action with appropriate responses to contain, resolve and educate on detected risk. Use Incydr Flows or SOAR integrations to initiate response controls that are proportionate to an activity’s risk severity. You’ll stop data leaks without getting in the way of employee collaboration and sanctioned file activity.

    Improving your Insider Risk posture requires a change in employee behavior. Code42 Instructor provides bite-sized training to employees, delivered when they need it. Use Instructor in tandem with Incydr to send responsive video lessons when employees put data at risk. You’ll ensure appropriate data governance and compliance with security standards and corporate policies as well as report on the positive impact of your Insider Risk Management program.

    Founded in 2001, the company is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and backed by Accel Partners, JMI Equity, NEA, and Split Rock Partners. For more information, visit code42.com.

    Now more than ever, your data is on the move—whether it’s on a laptop, flash drive, or moving across physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures. At any point along the way, your financial data, customer information, intellectual property, or trade secrets could be lost or stolen. Securing this data is further complicated by several growing risk factors:

    Rapidly evolving compliance regulations and mandates, including GDPR
    Continued growth of workforce mobility
    Employees using their own mobile devices and consumer apps for work
    Rising frequency of advanced persistent threats (APTs) and data breach incidents

    To avoid the embarrassment, reputation damage, regulatory fines, and revenue loss, today’s enterprise must be able to identify, track, and secure all confidential data from multiple points within the organisation and in the cloud without impacting employee productivity and performance. In the past, many organisations tried traditional data loss prevention (DLP) solutions but found they were too intrusive, too complex to manage, and too costly to acquire, deploy, and maintain.

    Sample Customers
    Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.
    Excite Japan, MEDHOST, United Way of Greater Atlanta, University of Florida at Shands
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University18%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Real Estate/Law Firm8%
    Non Profit8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Educational Organization6%
    University6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise19%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Code42 Incydr vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Code42 Incydr vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Code42 Incydr is ranked 15th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 78 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 13th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. Code42 Incydr is rated 9.0, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of Code42 Incydr writes "Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Good for data blocking and security, content categorization, and generating accessibility reports ". Code42 Incydr is most compared with Threat Detection, Investigation & Response (TDIR) Platform, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Morphisec, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian and McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. See our Code42 Incydr vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.