Compare Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Cylance

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is ranked 24th in Endpoint Protection for Business with 1 review while Cylance is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection for Business with 6 reviews. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated 9.0, while Cylance is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection writes " Effective heuristics make for better ransomware protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cylance writes "Endpoints are protected in real-time without the need of a centralized server". Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP), Bitdefender GravityZone and Sophos Intercept X, whereas Cylance is most compared with CrowdStrike, Carbon Black CB Defense and SentinelOne.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, Microsoft, HCL and others in Endpoint Protection for Business. Updated: October 2019.
379,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well.

Read more »

On the management side, we liked the way it displays things.The solution is extremely scalable. It's got the hybrid functionality, it's got the system functionality and cloud functionality as well.The solution is stable.The solution is pretty easy to scale.It handles situations that the other threat management tools wouldn't find. It has worked well covering the weaker sides of the other products that we're integrating.​Centralized dashboard online which can be used for managing a huge product.Even if an endpoint loses connection to the Internet, I know that endpoint is protected against 99.99% of the threats in the wild today.Specifically for a Windows domain environment, the product can be customized and pushed via GPO or SCCM without issue.​

Read more »

Cons
Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine.

Read more »

It should provide more details about the events that they have detected.I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices.The solution needs better dashboards that are easier to use.The security scripting needs improvement. It needs deeper security for scripting.I would like to see a better UI in terms of sifting through more specific data and providing analytics. A little bit more would be nice.​Work on the math model. We are catching a lot of false positives, which gets to be a pain at the start of a deployment.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
We would just add more if there are new users, but right now you just need one license for per user.Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.​Shop around for sure and be assured the price you pay will be close to other solutions available, but even at a slight mark-up from the other solutions, you are getting real endpoint protection versus nothing more than a cheap security blanket that might keep you warm at night.Do not get hung up on price. You pay for what you get and expensive will hurt one time, where cheap will hurt forever, especially if you fall victim to a ransom attack, etc.​

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection for Business solutions are best for your needs.
379,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
944
Comparisons
738
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
995
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
30,098
Comparisons
23,878
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
485
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
Comodo AEP
Learn
Comodo
Cylance
Overview

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.

Cylance® is revolutionizing cybersecurity with products and services that proactively prevent, rather than reactively detect the execution of advanced persistent threats and malware. Our technology is deployed on over four million endpoints and protects hundreds of enterprise clients worldwide including Fortune 100 organizations and government institutions.

Offer
Learn more about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
Learn more about Cylance
Sample Customers
Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI PropertiesPanasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company20%
Manufacturing Company8%
Media Company7%
Retailer7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, Microsoft, HCL and others in Endpoint Protection for Business. Updated: October 2019.
379,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email