Compare CyberArk PAS vs. Fudo PAM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyberArk PAS Logo
38,468 views|18,473 comparisons
Fudo PAM Logo
910 views|605 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Fudo PAM and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks.""The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.""When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution.""Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control.""CyberArk is a very stable product and it's a stable product because it has a simple design and a simple architecture that allows you to leverage the economies of scale across the base of your infrastructure that you already have implemented. It doesn't really introduce any new complex pieces of infrastructure that would make it that much more difficult to scale.""CyberArk has been easy for us to implement and the adoption has been good. We've been able to standardize a bunch of things. We've been able to standardize relatively easily with the use of the platforms and managing the policies.""The risk of lost password and forbidden access to resources has been drastically reduced which increased the security level for the entire company,""The technical support is good."

More CyberArk PAS Pros »

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector.""it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company.""We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

More Fudo PAM Pros »

Cons
"Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server.""Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.""The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time.""It's a big program. To scale excessively, locally, on an on-prem application, takes a lot of servers.""CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms.""There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution.""It needs better documentation with more examples for the configuration files and API/REST integration""We found a lot of errors during the initial setup. They should work to improve the implementation experience and to remove errors from the process."

More CyberArk PAS Cons »

"Professional training and certification would be great.""The configuration is difficult.""The stability is not very good."

More Fudo PAM Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company.
Top Answer: Professional training and certification would be great. Regional support in Ukraine is lacking, although they are new and do not have many offices around the world. It would be helpful to have the… more »
Top Answer: We use this product to control access and to administer computers and servers in our company. We are a reseller. We have engineers who configure Fudo Privileged Access Management and deploy the… more »
Ranking
Views
38,468
Comparisons
18,473
Reviews
21
Average Words per Review
546
Rating
9.1
Views
910
Comparisons
605
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
464
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege ManagerFudo Privileged Access Management
Learn
CyberArk
Fudo Security
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Offer
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Learn more about Fudo PAM
Sample Customers
Rockwell AutomationKFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Insurance Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise72%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Fudo PAM and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management with 13 reviews while Fudo PAM is ranked 7th in Privileged Access Management with 3 reviews. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while Fudo PAM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Provides simplicity and ease of implementation for the right level of security controls". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Our research shows this is superior to competing products in some ways". CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Thycotic Secret Server, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and One Identity Manager, whereas Fudo PAM is most compared with One Identity Safeguard, WALLIX Bastion, Thycotic Secret Server and NetIQ Privileged Account Manager. See our CyberArk PAS vs. Fudo PAM report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.