Compare CyberArk PAS vs. Oracle Access Manager

CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Access Management with 53 reviews while Oracle Access Manager is ranked 12th in Access Management with 2 reviews. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while Oracle Access Manager is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Gives us the security of all credentials in one place and lightens our administrative load". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "Decreases the complexity of access which saves time, confusion and trouble". CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Okta, CA SSO and Ping Identity. See our CyberArk PAS vs. Oracle Access Manager report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks.There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product.We are maintaining compliance in PCI, SOX and HIPPA, which is a big thing. Auditors really like it, and it has made us stay compliant.We are able to know who is accessing what and when; having accountability.This solution is quite stable.The most valuable feature is that it always provides flexibility, password quality and one-time user check-in and check-out.I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature.

Read more »

Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products.

Read more »

Cons
Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server.The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it.Make it easier to deploy.I think having a distributed architecture would certainly help this solution.There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar.If we could have some kind of out-of-the box feature that you can simply say "no" so they don't have to go into a development mode, that would a really helpful feature.Tech support staff can be more proactive.

Read more »

May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
In comparison to other products on the market, CyberArk is a more costly product.This solution is considered to be more expensive than others out there on the market today.I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product.No, I do not have any advice on the price of the product.Network and security licenses are currently being managed by other outsource vendors, so they are facing some type of problems in the digital aspect.With reducing the privileged account access, there has been a huge improvement. They are now bringing more accounts on a little at a time.If you are looking at implementing this solution, buy the training and go to it.Our risk is definitely significantly lower. Also, our resources are low.

Read more »

Can be expensive as a solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
out of 24 in Access Management
Views
30,366
Comparisons
15,822
Reviews
51
Average Words per Review
571
Avg. Rating
9.0
12th
out of 24 in Access Management
Views
626
Comparisons
364
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
566
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege Manager
Learn
CyberArk
Oracle
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.
Offer
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Learn more about Oracle Access Manager
Sample Customers
Rockwell AutomationSekerBank, University of Melbourne
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm28%
Insurance Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Healthcare Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company25%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider10%
Retailer8%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email