Compare CyberArk PAS vs. Oracle Access Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
438,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The risk of lost password and forbidden access to resources has been drastically reduced which increased the security level for the entire company,""CyberArk has been easy for us to implement and the adoption has been good. We've been able to standardize a bunch of things. We've been able to standardize relatively easily with the use of the platforms and managing the policies.""CyberArk is a very stable product and it's a stable product because it has a simple design and a simple architecture that allows you to leverage the economies of scale across the base of your infrastructure that you already have implemented. It doesn't really introduce any new complex pieces of infrastructure that would make it that much more difficult to scale.""When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution.""Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control.""The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.""For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks.""There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product."

More CyberArk PAS Pros »

"The product allows customization via custom code.""The product was built to be scalable.""In general, the customization that is offered is very good. The company that I am working with currently is using this feature quite extensively.""The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients.""I would tell others that this solution is reliable. If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one.""Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products."

More Oracle Access Manager Pros »

Cons
"It needs better documentation with more examples for the configuration files and API/REST integration""There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution.""CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms.""The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time.""It's a big program. To scale excessively, locally, on an on-prem application, takes a lot of servers.""Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.""Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server.""The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it."

More CyberArk PAS Cons »

"The technical support is not very good at all.""The product is complicated and difficult to install and configure.""There are problems with stability.""The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive.""The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality.""In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the interface.""May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products."

More Oracle Access Manager Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"In comparison to other products on the market, CyberArk is a more costly product.""This solution is considered to be more expensive than others out there on the market today.""I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product.""No, I do not have any advice on the price of the product.""Network and security licenses are currently being managed by other outsource vendors, so they are facing some type of problems in the digital aspect."

More CyberArk PAS Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Can be expensive as a solution."

More Oracle Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
438,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control.
Top Answer: Privileged Access Management is a business transformation program. It forces business to look at their overall operating model for system administrative and application based access, and develop a… more »
Top Answer: We're pretty excited about Alero, the third-party access management. As a small company we lean on vendors quite a bit and we do that in multiple areas. That's going to be a big one for us. It's just… more »
Top Answer: The product allows customization via custom code.
Top Answer: I'm not in charge of the pricing or things of that nature. However, I am aware that the ministry I'm working with has a special contract with Oracle. They have their own pricing system here.
Top Answer: I think two aspects of this product can be improved. The first is that the product overly complex to install and configure. The second is the reliability of the product. It was not very stable and… more »
Ranking
Views
38,189
Comparisons
18,074
Reviews
25
Average Words per Review
508
Avg. Rating
9.1
3rd
out of 31 in Access Management
Views
1,294
Comparisons
874
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
687
Avg. Rating
7.6
Popular Comparisons
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege Manager
Learn
CyberArk
Oracle
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.
Offer
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Learn more about Oracle Access Manager
Sample Customers
Rockwell AutomationSekerBank, University of Melbourne
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm28%
Insurance Company14%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government5%
Insurance Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Government32%
Comms Service Provider11%
Wholesaler/Distributor3%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise73%
REVIEWERS
Small Business40%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
438,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management with 27 reviews while Oracle Access Manager is ranked 3rd in Access Management with 5 reviews. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while Oracle Access Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Provides simplicity and ease of implementation for the right level of security controls". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "Has the ability to customize it with your own code but is too complex for most uses". CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Thycotic Secret Server, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Symantec Siteminder, ForgeRock, PingID and Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium. See our CyberArk PAS vs. Oracle Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.