We compared CylancePROTECT and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: After reviewing both CylancePROTECT and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, it is clear that CylancePROTECT stands out for its easy deployment, accurate threat detection, and powerful machine-learning capabilities. However, it does receive criticism for its pricing, lack of user-friendliness, and inadequate support. On the other hand, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers a user-friendly interface, efficient management, and strong overall performance. Areas of improvement for Kaspersky include pricing, deployment efficiency, and support. Despite mixed reviews on pricing and support for both products, CylancePROTECT places a greater emphasis on AI-based threat detection, while Kaspersky prioritizes user-friendliness and control.
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"Its setup is simple if you have a Windows device; it is executable."
"It is extremely simple to manage and deploy."
"What I like best about CylancePROTECT is its accuracy, as it doesn't give many false positives."
"The solution’s AI is its most valuable feature."
"Specifically for a Windows domain environment, the product can be customized and pushed via GPO or SCCM without issue."
"The solution is extremely scalable. It's got the hybrid functionality, it's got the system functionality and cloud functionality as well."
"We are quite security-focused. Blackberry Protect as an endpoint solution for our service really delivers what we are expecting."
"It does a good job of protecting us."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business's most valuable feature is the ease of management."
"The solution has been quite stable."
"Center Management"
"The signature update is done securely."
"The product can scale if you need it to."
"The antivirus feature is very, very good."
"Kaspersky protects our company from ransomware attacks. We have multiple sites across the country, including the principal headquarters and different towns. We can see any viruses that are in the network and take action."
"It offers very good security protection."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"Detections could be improved."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices."
"The product must make the interface a little more user-friendly."
"The management console needs a little maturity in how it presents data and allows the administrator to drill down or search across systems."
"The AI of CylancePROTECT has room for improvement. I'm on a trial license of SentinelOne, and its AI is much better than what's on CylancePROTECT."
"The price for this EPP platform is expensive and could be improved."
"Having worked with SentinelOne, Cylance is good, however, it probably needs to add a feature similar to SentinelOne's rollback functionality. With this feature, if you get infected, with a click, you can go back to the pre-infection state. If Cylance could add this functionality to their offering as well, that would be ideal."
"The user interface is outdated."
"If they can add more features on top of their Persona feature that would be ideal."
"They should continue to put more security measures in place in order to make it more robust."
"Areas for improvement include signature update management and selecting the respective features on the endpoint side."
"Kaspersky could be improved by better malware protection. They have to take advantage of Malwarebytes and integrate the same engine inside Kaspersky. I use Malwarebytes as well because Kaspersky doesn't always detect malware."
"It slows down the system sometimes, and it has the occasional false positive where it deems something a virus when it isn't."
"The deployment could be better."
"I would like the solution to be able to allow to have end to end security services from the final user to the server."
"We have had some problems with it comes to uninstalling it, so you have to make sure that you do everything right."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security could have more visibility and threat hunting. Right now, if it detects a file, it's quarantined, and then we can't find more details other than the path and the file name. We don't see what process it's warning off and how the virus got in. So, the reporting on the quarantined items, why were they quarantined, etc., could be improved."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
CylancePROTECT is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 110 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trellix Endpoint Security, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiClient, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security. See our CylancePROTECT vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.