Most Helpful Review | |||||
|
| ||||
Find out what your peers are saying about Cylance vs. Sophos Intercept X and other solutions. Updated: November 2019. 382,745 professionals have used our research since 2012. |
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
On the management side, we liked the way it displays things. The solution is extremely scalable. It's got the hybrid functionality, it's got the system functionality and cloud functionality as well. The solution is stable. The solution is pretty easy to scale. It handles situations that the other threat management tools wouldn't find. It has worked well covering the weaker sides of the other products that we're integrating. Centralized dashboard online which can be used for managing a huge product. Even if an endpoint loses connection to the Internet, I know that endpoint is protected against 99.99% of the threats in the wild today. Specifically for a Windows domain environment, the product can be customized and pushed via GPO or SCCM without issue. | The forensics within the solution are quite good. The ransomware mitigation is also impressive. The most valuable features are the range and restriction. After that, the client switched to Sophos to get the protection they lacked. It either works or it doesn’t and Sophos works. All of the features are very important for anyone who is supporting a large number of computers. It is a practically maintenance free intelligent system that independently protects environments from malicious attacks. A valuable feature offered by Sophos is called Naked Security, and it entails the control managed by the firewall on the site regarding the desktop client interfacing with our cloud client. The most valuable feature is the supervisory side of it where we can watch the throughputs, and even the loading of the device, to see how much traffic is happening. We most value the price and interface quality with Sophos Intercept X. We focus on solution quality. |
Cons | |
It should provide more details about the events that they have detected. I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices. The solution needs better dashboards that are easier to use. The security scripting needs improvement. It needs deeper security for scripting. I would like to see a better UI in terms of sifting through more specific data and providing analytics. A little bit more would be nice. Work on the math model. We are catching a lot of false positives, which gets to be a pain at the start of a deployment. | To be a perfect product, the price would have to be a bit better. They might want to offer an MSP model for licensing, to offer the solution as a software as a service. The price of this solution can be improved. The product defends very well on its own but could possibly use enhancement in giving users more controls. The initial setup was not very user-friendly. In terms of the site-to-site VPN elements, they tend to concentrate. It's quite simple when there are Meraki devices at both ends of the VPN but if there is another user at one end, on another device, it can be a bit tricky. So they could really simplify that process a bit. Sophos needs to create a YouTube channel with educational material for technicians or engineers. They should work on the logs and events. Sophos Intercept X needs to increase the interface test so that it can export to a live event. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
We would just add more if there are new users, but right now you just need one license for per user. Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. Shop around for sure and be assured the price you pay will be close to other solutions available, but even at a slight mark-up from the other solutions, you are getting real endpoint protection versus nothing more than a cheap security blanket that might keep you warm at night. Do not get hung up on price. You pay for what you get and expensive will hurt one time, where cheap will hurt forever, especially if you fall victim to a ransom attack, etc. | The price is pretty good. We renew the license for one year at $10,000. |
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection for Business solutions are best for your needs. 382,745 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking | |
Views 30,141 Comparisons 24,068 Reviews 6 Average Words per Review 475 Avg. Rating 8.2 | Views 2,296 Comparisons 1,860 Reviews 9 Average Words per Review 421 Avg. Rating 8.4 |
Top Comparisons | |
Compared 24% of the time. Compared 11% of the time. Compared 10% of the time. | Compared 16% of the time. Compared 13% of the time. Compared 12% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
Intercept X | |
Learn | |
Cylance | Sophos |
Overview | |
Cylance® is revolutionizing cybersecurity with products and services that proactively prevent, rather than reactively detect the execution of advanced persistent threats and malware. Our technology is deployed on over four million endpoints and protects hundreds of enterprise clients worldwide including Fortune 100 organizations and government institutions. | Sophos Intercept X stops the widest range of attacks with a unique combination of deep learning malware detection, exploit prevention, anti-ransomware, and more. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Cylance | Learn more about Sophos Intercept X |
Sample Customers | |
Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit | Flexible Systems |
Top Industries | |
Software R&D Company20% Manufacturing Company8% Media Company7% Retailer7% | Software R&D Company27% Comms Service Provider10% Manufacturing Company8% Media Company7% |
See also Cylance Reviews, Sophos Intercept X Reviews, and our list of Best Endpoint Protection for Business Companies.