We performed a comparison between Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) and Unitrends based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp and others in Deduplication Software."The compression aspect of the solution is great."
"It is secure, reliable, and has officer support."
"This is a superior and reliable backup system that can handle large capacities with little management."
"It's very easy to use the domain once it's been set up. The interface is also user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of Dell EMC PowerProtect DD are the duplication security and uptime."
"Deduplication and compression are the best features of the solution, which are popular and very effective."
"The technology has been very useful. There are lots of features on offer."
"The solution is very stable."
"Stability-wise, I rate this solution a nine out of ten."
"It is fairly stable."
"It is a quick and easy way to organize my backups and to keep track of them."
"They have great support."
"I am impressed with the tool's reporting and UniView features."
"It is an easy system to use. The support, if needed, is always willing to help."
"Unitrends has helped us cut down the time that it takes to restore a server to its original configuration."
"Backup/archive to multiple locations."
"The pricing could be lower."
"First-time integrations are difficult in NetWorker. NetWorker software needs to be simplified. It's very complex."
"The licensing is not cost-effective, and the pricing could be better."
"We are not able to deal directly with the OEM we have to go to their partners in Nigeria."
"The downside of PowerProtect's flexibility is that you have so many options. It can be a little confusing. It's like having a car with too many buttons on the dash. You can do so much with it, but it takes some time to learn what everything does."
"I would like to see integration with public cloud."
"They still have hardware different from the software."
"Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) is expensive. Also, it has a sort of a big physical footprint that data domains have, and that's part of the problem."
"I would like to see the real-time replication process improved, and a zero RPO feature added."
"It seems like Unitrends moved away from enterprise customer engagement and moved more towards the managed service provider market."
"The solution’s support and onboarding process needs to be improved."
"If the interface could be less complex, it is would be great."
"There's a lot that can be made better. For example, it could be more scalable."
"The solution's base operating system needs to be improved."
"Techs don't see to be well-versed in troubleshooting issues that arise and tickets stay opened for weeks for resolution."
"Making the seeding process more accessible and easier to understand. Also, make more of the undocumented best practices easier to find."
More Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) is ranked 1st in Deduplication Software with 61 reviews while Unitrends is ranked 42nd in Backup and Recovery with 34 reviews. Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) is rated 8.4, while Unitrends is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) writes "Supports business continuity process but needs improvement in pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unitrends writes "The solution can be used to back up servers and Hyper-V cluster nodes, but its support is super expensive". Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) is most compared with HPE StoreOnce, Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, ExaGrid EX Series, Rubrik and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Unitrends is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Acronis Cyber Protect, Commvault Cloud and Arcserve UDP.
We monitor all Deduplication Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.