We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and Falcon LogScale based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The most valuable feature the solution offers right now is the PurePath. When we see a web request, and something failing, we can drill down using PurePath."
"The benefits we receive using this tool increase productivity, which increase revenue."
"It seems to be very stable. We have not had any outages attributed to the product."
"We have identified some critical issues, which are not available or recreatable in the Dev or QA environment."
"Google says is that you have a number of things on which you should measure your performance. One is if there's an error or not. Dynatrace tells you whether is an error or not. Second is saturation, whether something is getting saturated. You should be aware of what is getting saturated. Dynatrace even tells you that. The third is if there is a latency. Network latency is also told to me by Dynatrace."
"One thing it helped with: We should never get traffic from outside the U.S. and we were getting traffic from Europe, and that was a problem. We found out what caused it. Dynatrace helped us find that information out. We wouldn't have found it otherwise."
"Dynatrace has great training available. It is easy for everybody to use. Anybody can go out to YouTube, watch a video, and figure out how to use the piece that they need."
"This solution has helped us with faster identification of the root cause, allowing faster resolution and increased uptime."
"It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"One thing that would help it tighter integration with DCRUM. It's somewhat difficult to drill down and see everything, but I think that's in the future versions. We just haven't seen that yet."
"The configuration of this solution is quite complex."
"It could be more affordable and therefore, more widely used by including more features like DEM as part of licensing cost rather than an additional expense."
"Dynatrace must reduce the required resources for on-premise, because they are too high."
"I'd like to see the UI a bit more polished. For example, I saw a demo of the dashboards here at the Perform 2018 conference. There was a table of these widgets, but they're not sorted alphabetically and there's, like, 50 of them. So if you want to find your widgets, you're of scrolling up and down. So small features, being able to search for widgets, that things are more categorized; just a bit more focused on the user experience."
"I would like to know if classes and methods selected in "Method Sensor Rules" were changed in the applications, and not depend on the developers to warn us."
"They could have a better user interface, better automation, better support for cloud-based, and SaaS applications."
"The problem evaluation feature is an awesome idea, but bit difficult to pick up initially."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
Dynatrace is ranked 4th in Log Management with 340 reviews while Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas Falcon LogScale is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, LogRhythm SIEM and Logpoint.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
