Compare Eggplant Performance vs. Micro Focus UFT One

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Eggplant Performance? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2020.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"This solution is quite costly and there is no free trial available."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Glad to see your post!! In the recent Microfocus version does Microfocus one UFT integration possible with Jira. If so How it is possible and how effective it is?
Top Answer: Any updates on this @Don Ingerson. I am trying to pre-assess the same question. Whether I would get any performance improvements in executing scripts (VBScripts) in UFT 14.XX or UFT 15.XX compared to… more »
Top Answer: Definitely OATS is an ideal tool for automation of oracle applications Oracle Fusion is developed using Oracle ADF and the open script has the add-in of Oracle Fusion for Fusion applications.… more »
Ranking
13th
Views
1,444
Comparisons
1,143
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
3rd
Views
23,565
Comparisons
15,200
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
736
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Also Known As
TestPlant eggPlant PerformanceUFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Keysight Technologies
Micro Focus
Overview
eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Offer
Learn more about Eggplant Performance
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Sample Customers
Cisco CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Financial Services Firm12%
Healthcare Company6%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Insurance Company18%
Healthcare Company14%
Retailer11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm7%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise68%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise89%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2020.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Eggplant Performance is ranked 13th in Performance Testing Tools while Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 10 reviews. Eggplant Performance is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus UFT One is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Eggplant Performance is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Appium, Apache JMeter, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT Developer, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and Ranorex Studio.

See our list of .

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.