Compare Apache JMeter vs. Eggplant Performance

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache JMeter Logo
14,461 views|12,087 comparisons
Eggplant Performance Logo
1,444 views|1,143 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Eggplant Performance? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2020.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Free""I switched to Apache because it is free. Other tools are much too expensive and can cost up to $50,000 a year if you are looking at commercial options.""This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.""This is an open-source product.""I was using the free version of the software.""In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free."

More Apache JMeter Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: When there's a high number of TPS I can achieve more transactions per seconds given the hyper-limitations.
Top Answer: We have some scenarios for diameter load testing where TPS requirements are very high, 30K or 40K TPS. In the telco area, this is for simulating mobile usage. However, diameter load testing can be… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
14,461
Comparisons
12,087
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
475
Avg. Rating
7.5
13th
Views
1,444
Comparisons
1,143
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Also Known As
JMeterTestPlant eggPlant Performance
Learn
Apache
Keysight Technologies
Overview

Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.

eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic
Offer
Learn more about Apache JMeter
Learn more about Eggplant Performance
Sample Customers
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western CapeCisco
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Computer Software Company23%
University8%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider16%
Media Company4%
Government4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Financial Services Firm12%
Healthcare Company6%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise48%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2020.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Apache JMeter is ranked 2nd in Performance Testing Tools with 12 reviews while Eggplant Performance is ranked 13th in Performance Testing Tools. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while Eggplant Performance is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Good reports and analysis capabilities with a quick initial setup". On the other hand, Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, LoadUI Pro and Neotys NeoLoad, whereas Eggplant Performance is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Appium, Micro Focus UFT One, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.