Compare Apache JMeter vs. Eggplant Performance

Apache JMeter is ranked 2nd in Performance Testing Tools with 5 reviews while Eggplant Performance is ranked 14th in Performance Testing Tools. Apache JMeter is rated 8.2, while Eggplant Performance is rated 0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Continuously offers new features and plug-ins and has valuable coding features ". On the other hand, Apache JMeter is most compared with LoadRunner, BlazeMeter and LoadUI Pro, whereas Eggplant Performance is most compared with Appium, LoadRunner and SmartBear TestComplete.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache JMeter Logo
10,951 views|9,482 comparisons
Eggplant Performance  Logo
1,540 views|1,039 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Eggplant Performance ? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, CA (A Broadcom Company) and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: October 2019.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.I switched to Apache because it is free. Other tools are much too expensive and can cost up to $50,000 a year if you are looking at commercial options.Free

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
10,951
Comparisons
9,482
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
367
Avg. Rating
8.2
14th
Views
1,540
Comparisons
1,039
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Also Known As
JMeterTestPlant eggPlant Performance
Learn
Apache
Eggplant
Overview

Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.

eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic
Offer
Learn more about Apache JMeter
Learn more about Eggplant Performance
Sample Customers
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western CapeCisco
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company48%
Comms Service Provider11%
Retailer5%
Government5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, CA (A Broadcom Company) and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: October 2019.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email