Ephesoft Transact vs OpenText Intelligent Capture comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ephesoft Logo
526 views|251 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
2,279 views|976 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ephesoft Transact and OpenText Intelligent Capture based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Ephesoft Transact vs. OpenText Intelligent Capture Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the inject feature. With desktop injects, we're doing all these things and extracting these things. Its stable, scalable, and technical support is good.""Transact's best feature is its ease of customization.""I have found the keyword extraction to be helpful."

More Ephesoft Transact Pros →

"The solution is very powerful because it allows for custom scripting.""The automated version of the vendor invoice management is great.""It allows you to image capture, scan documents and use machine learning to automatically index and tie them.""Being able to have accurate extraction is most valuable. It has machine learning and other tools to make the extraction more accurate.""The enterprise and capturing feature of OpenText is its valuable feature. As we have integrated CRM with OpenText.""We use it to capture documents coming through our product and mobile channels and make them available for our business to access and email. We use it to automate the email workflow in our applications, pull the documents, and email them to the users."

More OpenText Intelligent Capture Pros →

Cons
"It's not easy to train.""Their email service and extraction could be better. We get the input via email, and these emails contain different types of documents like Excel, PDF, or they may contain different content in the email body. Due to this variation, sometimes the email service crashes, and emails aren't redirected to Ephesoft Transact. Ephesoft has provided us with new hotfixes. Whatever flaws we found in the 2019.2 version, they have already updated it in the new version, 20.1.05, and it's already released. Drawbacks like not capturing the handwritten fields are now sorted.""Transact could be improved by removing Java and making its pricing more accessible for smaller customers."

More Ephesoft Transact Cons →

"I would say what most of the document management solutions are lacking is smartness to detect the duplicate storage of the documents""If something is handwritten and attached to an email, it doesn't capture the information correctly.""The setup is medium complexity.""We are using it to improve the image and the documentation for the cases. And sometimes, some cases have more than fifteen different types. We use some tools as fixed standard analysis and provide information to support the different types to take some decisions and help in an automated process. We choose the case type and subtype DNS scanning documents from the data entry up.""It can be more user-friendly, and it should also have more reporting capabilities. There are also a few other things that need improvement.""The area for improvement primarily centers around licensing concerns rather than technical issues. Captiva, intended for larger clients, poses challenges for medium and small businesses due to licensing costs. The current licensing model is based on volume, such as purchasing a volume for one million dollars per year for scanning. This pricing structure may be prohibitive for companies with constrained budgets. Another aspect requiring attention is the mobile capture feature, which, although experiencing recent enhancements in intelligent document processing through AI, could benefit from further improvements. Specifically, there is room for enhancement in enabling users to efficiently capture documents using their smartphones.""Knowledge of .NET is required to effectively use the solution or it can be complicated."

More OpenText Intelligent Capture Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Initially, when I got a licensed copy of Ephesoft Transact, it was for one year. After one year, we had to send an email to the Ephesoft team informing them that our license was going to expire. They updated it and provided one license in our file, and we had to update and install the folder. They have versions for one year and lifelong as well."
  • "Transact's pricing could be better for smaller customers."
  • More Ephesoft Transact Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Some customers say the solution can get costly because it requires licenses or enterprise packages."
  • "OpenText is an expensive solution."
  • More OpenText Intelligent Capture Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have found the keyword extraction to be helpful.
    Top Answer:The pricing is fair. It's not too expensive. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:The configuration can be a bit much. The AML engine part could be better. It's not easy to train. It's not so easy to train the system. If it's not trained, the accuracy will be off. They need to… more »
    Top Answer:The enterprise and capturing feature of OpenText is its valuable feature. As we have integrated CRM with OpenText.
    Top Answer:The area for improvement primarily centers around licensing concerns rather than technical issues. Captiva, intended for larger clients, poses challenges for medium and small businesses due to… more »
    Top Answer:It is designed for the automated capture and recognition of documents. Whether obtained through scanning, emails, faxes, or other sources, documents can be captured and data automatically extracted… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    526
    Comparisons
    251
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    593
    Rating
    6.0
    Views
    2,279
    Comparisons
    976
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    440
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OpenText Captivas
    Learn More
    Overview

    Ephesoft provides intelligent document processing solutions with industry-leading technology to help enterprises maximize their productivity. Using AI and patented machine learning technology, Ephesoft’s platform captures data from documents, enriches it with context and amplifies the power of that data, adding intelligence to accelerate any business process and drive successful digital transformation. Once the data is unlocked, Ephesoft classifies it and easily export the data into any ERP, Content Services, RPA, Workflow or other repository.

    Customers who have a high volume of valuable documents like invoices, records, contracts, mail, claims or loans, can benefit by accelerating and streamlining processes, eliminating manual data entry and boosting productivity. It’s time to automate your processes and get work done faster.

    OpenText™ Intelligent Capture, formerly OpenText Captiva, is an enterprise capture platform, providing omni-channel capabilities for collecting everything from scanned paper to chatbots. It is not just for organizing content at the front door, but automating processes across the enterprise. It can automate processes for standard documents, such as Financial Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable, or complex documents, such as contracts or partner requests that require action based on the document’s content.

    Sample Customers
    Honda Logistics, Washington State Health Care Authority
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Retailer7%
    Wholesaler/Distributor6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Ephesoft Transact vs. OpenText Intelligent Capture
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ephesoft Transact vs. OpenText Intelligent Capture and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ephesoft Transact is ranked 12th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 3 reviews while OpenText Intelligent Capture is ranked 7th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 7 reviews. Ephesoft Transact is rated 7.6, while OpenText Intelligent Capture is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ephesoft Transact writes "A stable and scalable smart content acquisition and data classification solution with a useful inject feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Intelligent Capture writes "A powerful solution for custom scripting but .NET knowledge is required". Ephesoft Transact is most compared with ABBYY Vantage and Tungsten RPA, whereas OpenText Intelligent Capture is most compared with ABBYY Vantage, Tungsten TotalAgility, UiPath Document Understanding, IBM Datacap and Rossum. See our Ephesoft Transact vs. OpenText Intelligent Capture report.

    See our list of best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors.

    We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.