We performed a comparison between Ephesoft Transact and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Transact's best feature is its ease of customization."
"I like the inject feature. With desktop injects, we're doing all these things and extracting these things. Its stable, scalable, and technical support is good."
"I have found the keyword extraction to be helpful."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"Transact could be improved by removing Java and making its pricing more accessible for smaller customers."
"Their email service and extraction could be better. We get the input via email, and these emails contain different types of documents like Excel, PDF, or they may contain different content in the email body. Due to this variation, sometimes the email service crashes, and emails aren't redirected to Ephesoft Transact. Ephesoft has provided us with new hotfixes. Whatever flaws we found in the 2019.2 version, they have already updated it in the new version, 20.1.05, and it's already released. Drawbacks like not capturing the handwritten fields are now sorted."
"It's not easy to train."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"The solution could use some AI integrated features."
"The product has some constraints and performance issues."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
"Its documentation is not widely available on the web. They should work on the availability of its documentation. In Automation Anywhere, there is a feature called Discovery Bot that automatically records the process steps and suggests a possible bot. I am not sure if such a feature is available in Kofax. If it is not available, it will be very good to have this feature. "
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
Ephesoft Transact is ranked 12th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 3 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Ephesoft Transact is rated 7.6, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Ephesoft Transact writes "A stable and scalable smart content acquisition and data classification solution with a useful inject feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Ephesoft Transact is most compared with ABBYY Vantage and OpenText Intelligent Capture, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our Ephesoft Transact vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
