Compare ESET Dynamic Threat Defense vs. Palo Alto Networks WildFire

ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is ranked 11th in Advanced Threat Protection with 1 review while Palo Alto Networks WildFire is ranked 1st in Advanced Threat Protection with 9 reviews. ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is rated 9.0, while Palo Alto Networks WildFire is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ESET Dynamic Threat Defense writes "Good pricing, an easy installation process and excellent technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks WildFire writes "Good technical support and provides automatic analysis that saves us time in filtering email". ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is most compared with FortiEDR, whereas Palo Alto Networks WildFire is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Firepower NGFW and Zscaler Internet Access.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use ESET Dynamic Threat Defense? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: March 2020.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The pricing, if compared to other products, is cheap.

Read more »

Using WildFire has reduced the number of viruses and the amount of malware that comes into our system, which means that I don't have to rely on the end-users to identify it.The way that the solution quickly updates to adjust to threats is the solution's most valuable aspect. When there's a security attack, within five minutes, all Wildfire subscribers have access to updates so that all systems will be safe. Its threat prevention is way better than other vendor products.The most valuable feature is the Automatic Verdict, to recognize whether something is a threat, or not.They have many different options with Palo Alto WildFire and the set-up is quick. If you have all the details in hand, it does not take more than 15 minutes to deploy a firewall.It helps us when segmenting and securing the network and all sort of technologies, all sort of next generation needs. It's next generation phases of firewall like anti-virus, sandboxing, wifi, and VPN.Being an application-based firewall, this is one of the critical focus factors along with the threat prevention services it provides.It is stable and pretty much scalable.The cloud-based services are a nice feature.

Read more »

Cons
The management of the solution isn't as clear as it could be. They could adjust that to make it a better product.

Read more »

It would be nice if there was an easier way to install and deploy it, such as through the inclusion of wizards.The size of Palo Alto's cloud is big but it could be easier to use from a product management perspective.I would like to see them continue on their developmental roadmap for the product.There are certain changes that I was expecting in the previous version, and I hope that they are soon fixed. All of the problems that I have faced so far have been resolved.Other vendors have some sort of bandwidth management built into the firewall itself and Palo Alto is missing that.As a firewall and 360 degrees of security, there needs to be more maturity.The initial setup was complex.I think it would be nice for Palo Alto to work without the connection to the cloud. It is 100% powerful when connected to the cloud. But, if you disconnect from the cloud, you only get 40-50% power.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
We pay between $3,000 and $4,000 CAD ($2,200 - $3,000 USD) per year to maintain this solution.The licensing fees are on an annual basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard fees.It's pretty expensive but with respect to value for money, it's okay.It is a reasonable price compared to other solutions on the market.The pricing is OK, it is not too expensive.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
149
Comparisons
46
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
432
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
40,365
Comparisons
35,033
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
533
Avg. Rating
8.7
Top Comparisons
Learn
ESET
Palo Alto Networks
Overview

ESET Dynamic Threat Defense provides another layer of security for ESET products like Mail Security and endpoint products by utilizing a cloud-based sandboxing technology to detect new, never before seen types of threats.

WildFire™ cloud-based threat analysis service is the industry’s most advanced analysis and prevention engine for highly evasive zero-day exploits and malware. The cloud-based service employs a unique multi-technique approach combining dynamic and static analysis, innovative machine learning techniques, and a groundbreaking bare metal analysis environment to detect and prevent even the most evasive threats.
Offer
Learn more about ESET Dynamic Threat Defense
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Novamedia, Nexon Asia Pacific, Lenovo, Samsonite, IOOF, Sinogrid, SanDisk Corporation
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Government20%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company10%
Healthcare Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government6%
Media Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business46%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise42%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise63%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: March 2020.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.