Compare Experitest vs. Ranorex Studio

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Experitest Logo
1,483 views|1,114 comparisons
Ranorex Studio Logo
7,564 views|5,666 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Ranorex and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: September 2021.
535,919 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

More Experitest Pros »

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations.""This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

More Ranorex Studio Pros »

Cons
"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

More Experitest Cons »

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved.""For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

More Ranorex Studio Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

More Experitest Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users.""There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

More Ranorex Studio Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
535,919 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run.
Top Answer: It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number… more »
Top Answer: I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
8th
Views
1,483
Comparisons
1,114
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
624
Rating
7.0
3rd
Views
7,564
Comparisons
5,666
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
636
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Experitest Seetest
Learn More
Overview

Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Offer
Learn more about Experitest
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Sample Customers
Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee
Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Manufacturing Company19%
Financial Services Firm19%
Newspaper6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider21%
Manufacturing Company6%
Government5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise32%
Large Enterprise41%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Ranorex and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: September 2021.
535,919 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Experitest is ranked 8th in Mobile App Testing Tools with 1 review while Ranorex Studio is ranked 3rd in Mobile App Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Experitest is rated 7.0, while Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Experitest writes "Useful for running tests on many different types of real devices but requires some end-to-end video examples to get started quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". Experitest is most compared with Perfecto, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, AWS Device Farm, Sauce Labs and Kobiton Mobile Device Testing, whereas Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ and froglogic Squish.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.