Compare F5 Advanced Firewall Manager vs. Kentik

F5 Advanced Firewall Manager is ranked 7th in DDoS with 6 reviews while Kentik is ranked 4th in DDoS with 7 reviews. F5 Advanced Firewall Manager is rated 8.4, while Kentik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of F5 Advanced Firewall Manager writes "Enables us to configure the product to the client's exact needs with unprecedented flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kentik writes "Gives us detailed NetFlow records and the ability to visualize them in multiple ways". F5 Advanced Firewall Manager is most compared with , whereas Kentik is most compared with ThousandEyes, Arbor DDoS and SolarWinds NPM. See our F5 Advanced Firewall Manager vs. Kentik report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Advanced Firewall Manager vs. Kentik and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The decryption is great.The solution is very straightforward. The usability is great.We use three main features. The first one is access control. The second feature we use is called IP intelligence. Finally, we have a DDoS safety feature.This product excells in every aspect from installation and the interface to providing superior network security.It blocks various attacks and mitigates disasters from occurring.I find the signature base is very helpful to see traffic

Read more »

One of the valuable features is the intuitive nature of building out reports, and then triggering actions based on specific metrics from those reports. It has a really good UI and the ability to surface data through the reporting functions is pretty good. That's helped a lot in the security space.We're pretty happy with the API functionality. It's web, and it's very simple to set up queries. It has served us well and you don't need to be an expert on the API or the product to set these things up.The most valuable features have been anything around traffic engineering: being able to determine the source or destination of a surge of traffic, whether it's DDoS-related, or a customer just happened to have a sudden uptick in traffic. Being able to tell where that's coming from or where it's going to enables us to do things based on that.The most valuable feature is being able to pull traffic patterns; to and from destinations. We're able to understand where our traffic is going, our top talkers from an AS set, as well as where our traffic's coming from.I am able to do a lot of work on the visualization end to create different visualizations and different ways to get information out of it.The drill-down into detailed views of network activity helps to quickly pinpoint locations and causes. All the information is there.Having the API access allows us to do a great deal of automation around a lot of our reporting and management tools.We're also using Kentik to ingest metrics. It's a useful feature, and its response time, whenever we're pulling back the data, is higher than our on-prem solution.

Read more »

Cons
Deployment times vary according to the customer. It needs to be heavily configured. You need to look and you need to observe the behavior of the traffic before you can start configuring everything. It can take time.The pricing of the solution could be a little bit better.Firstly, geolocation currently relies on manual updates. It has to move to automatic updates. There are no automatic updates for this feature. If some IPs, countries, or service providers move to another country, now you will be allow IPs that you previously denied. This is because you depend on the database, which doesn't update automatically. This is really a very important area that they need to improve.This would be absolutely the best network security solution if the price were not so high.We needed to protect the database but the solution didn't offer a certain feature to do so.We would have preferred to have support when we first started

Read more »

I believe they're already working on this, but I would love for them to create better integrations from network flow data to application performance — tracing — so that we could overlay that data more readily. With more companies going hybrid, flow logs and flow data, whether it be VPC or on-prem, matched with application performance and trace data, is pretty important.We asked for a way, regarding the potential networks that exist, to hook Kentik up with external tools like peering DBs to correlate things together and see what we can do... This is all in the [next] beta now.They're moving more in a direction where they are saying, "Hey, here's information that you may be interested in or may a need," before the question has to explicitly be asked. Continuing to move in that direction would be a good thing.The only downside to Kentik, something that I don't like, is that it's great that it shows you where these anomalies lie, but it's not actionable. Kentik is valuable, don't get me wrong, but if it had an actionable piece to it...I would like to see them explore the area of cost analysis.There is room for improvement around the usability of the API. It's a hugely complex task to call it and you need a lot of backing to be able to do it. I should say, as someone who's not in networking, maybe it's easier for people who are in networking, but for me that one part is not very user-friendly.I've checked out the V4 version of the interface and it's still a little bit clunky for me to use. I still go back to the old interface. That's definitely one that they still need to work on. It doesn't seem like everything that you get in the V3, the older interface, is there. For instance, I was trying to add a user or do the administrative tasks in V4, and I couldn't figure out where I was supposed to do that.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It is somewhat on the expensive side although it is worth the additional cost.

Read more »

We have an annual contract with Kentik that we renew each year for a set number of licenses. We also have some burstable licenses which we can spin up and spin down, and those are paid as they are used.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DDoS solutions are best for your needs.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
7th
out of 36 in DDoS
Views
150
Comparisons
26
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
667
Avg. Rating
8.4
4th
out of 36 in DDoS
Views
2,266
Comparisons
1,085
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
2,144
Avg. Rating
9.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
F5 AFM
Learn
F5
Kentik
Overview

At F5, we give our customers the freedom to securely deliver every app, anywhere—with confidence. All F5 products are highly programmable and integrate into any environment, whether on premises or in any cloud. To date, 48 of the Fortune 50 companies rely on F5 to deliver apps that customers and employees can securely access at any time, on any device, from any location.

Kentik's AIOps Network Traffic Intelligence platform unifies network operations, performance, security, and business intelligence. 

With a purpose-built big data engine delivered as public or private SaaS, Kentik captures a high-resolution view of actual network traffic data and enriches it with critical application and business data, so every network event or analysis can be tied to revenue & costs, customer & user experience, performance & risk.

Offer
Learn more about F5 Advanced Firewall Manager
Learn more about Kentik
Sample Customers
City Bank, Ricacorp Properties, Miele, American Systems, Bangladesh Post OfficePandora, Yelp, Neustar, Box, University of Washington, Zoom, Tata, and Cogent.
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider43%
University14%
Software R&D Company14%
Music Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company37%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company7%
Local Government7%
Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Advanced Firewall Manager vs. Kentik and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all DDoS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.