We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The initial setup of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is easy."
"Simple to deploy, simple to use, and user-friendly."
"The initial setup is so easy and there is no problem in the implementation."
"FortiAuthenticator is easy to use."
"The current version is stable...Scalability-wise, it is a fine solution"
"It keeps track of users and their IPs no matter where they are in the network. When users roam, we don't have to worry about not mapping them to an IP."
"This is a scalable product."
"Features the addition and removal of access as needed for the VPN."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."
"The GUI is on the older side but I'm sure that it will be upgraded soon. It works, but it looks a little dated."
"If you want some other FortiAuthenticator from one site to another site, you should have requirements, but really if you have authentication and directory or another solution, you should change the password of the authenticator between the solution and the directory and other things. So transfer of data and other information should be simpler."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator's initial setup process could be easier."
"The integration with other products, for example, some SAML authentications, would make it more flexible."
"The solution could be more automated. It should be able to let me automate a lot of things so that what normally is done as a matter of manual processes can be handled quicker. Slow integrations can be taken up/out if there was more automation."
"It would be helpful to receive a code by yourself for authentication instead of it registered to a phone."
"The technical support team is bad."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 19th in Single Sign-On (SSO). Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Auth0.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.