Compare Fortinet FortiGate vs. Meraki MX Firewalls

Fortinet FortiGate is ranked 1st in Firewalls with 59 reviews while Meraki MX Firewalls is ranked 6th in Firewalls with 15 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate is rated 8.6, while Meraki MX Firewalls is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate writes "The IPsec tunnels are very easily created, and quite interoperable with devices from other vendors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Meraki MX Firewalls writes "A good firewall solution for small companies with a small IT department or no IT staff at all". Fortinet FortiGate is most compared with Cisco ASA NGFW, Meraki MX Firewalls and Sophos UTM, whereas Meraki MX Firewalls is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco ASA NGFW and SonicWall NSA. See our Fortinet FortiGate vs. Meraki MX Firewalls report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco ASA NGFW Logo
70,607 views|52,642 comparisons
Fortinet FortiGate Logo
168,200 views|113,776 comparisons
Meraki MX Firewalls Logo
44,091 views|32,254 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Jurgen Dendas
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiGate vs. Meraki MX Firewalls and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most important point is the detection engine which is now part of the next-generation firewalls and which is supported by Cisco Talos.The most valuable features are the flexibility and level of security that this solution provides.Integration with all the other Cisco tools is valuable.We moved from a legacy firewall to the ASA with FirePOWER, increasing our Internet Edge defense dramatically.Cisco ASA NGFW significantly improves our bank. It protects any high-value products that we use from hackers, viruses, malware, and script-bots. It gives us metrics on network traffic as well as what kind of attacks we are getting from the outside.Right now, Cisco ASA NGFW has given us a lot of improvement. We are planning to move to a new facility and will be a much larger organization.The feature that I found most valuable is the overall stability of the product.The stability of Cisco ASA is excellent compared to other products on the market. Because of our customer experience as an integrator company, our clients never report any performance problems. We have a good performance reputation with Cisco ASA.

Read more »

The security features are about the best that I've seen anywhere.It blocks the vulnerabilities that can negatively impact us.Advanced routing (RIP, OSPF, BGP, PBR). It gives you a seamless and simple integration into a large network.Anti-Spam web content filterinG.This solution has solid UTM features combined with a nice GUI.This is a quality product with ok support, and it is better than the competition we've tried.The features that we have found most valuable are the SSL VPN and the User Portal.We have been able to offer several services to customers in a single box.

Read more »

I like the automatic firmware updates. We use the Active Directory to authenticate VPN users.I use Meraki in my POCs and with my customers as well.Point-to-point VPNs can dynamically follow IP changes with no need for static IPs.Dual WAN connections are greatly simplified and point-to-point VPNs automatically connect regardless of what WAN connection is active.The internet traffic shaping has been very valuable.Deployment takes no more than one working day.The initial setup for me was straightforward.A strong, reliable solution for small companies with little or no dedicated IT department.

Read more »

Cons
Most users do not have awareness of this product's functionality and features. Cisco should do something to make them aware of them. That would be quite excellent and useful to organizations that are still using legacy data-center-security products.There was an error in the configuration, related to our uplink switches, that caused us to contact technical support, and it took a very long time to resolve the issue.With regards to stability, we had a critical bug come out during our evaluation... not good.The product would be improved if the GUI could be brought into the 21st Century.Cisco should improve its user interface design. There is a deep learning curve to the product if you are a newcomer.There is no support here in Georgia. If something goes wrong, support is not always very helpful with the other firewalls or other products.One of my main concerns, an area that could use improvement is in adjusting the need to buy a license to enable features.Usually, the customers are satisfied, but I am going to recommend that all clients upgrade to FirePOWER management. I want Cisco to improve the feature called anti-spam. We use a Cisco only email solution, that's why we need the anti-spam on email facility.

Read more »

Technical support for this solution can be improved.I would like to have logs, monitoring, and reporting for a month without extra fees.I think there could be more QoS featuresThe Web-filter in this solution is not very good.FortiOS is not simple.This product could be improved with Active directory integration and better handling in IPsec and GRE Tunnels.I use the FortiGate 60D model and realized the 300Mbps bandwidth limitation. Because it is a product that offers many services, I think it could have greater bandwidth capacity.Some features of Fortinet FortiGate are actually fee enabled that are inconvenient for deploying in production. Other issues relate to isolation with Cisco products and your server.

Read more »

Expensive licensing and firewall stops immediately working if the license is not renewed at expiration date.I need more UTM protection security features.Meraki tech support staff have a lot more visibility into your network than you do, which is frustrating at times. I understand the approach is to keep the dashboard easier to understand. This will frustrate more advanced users at times.​The IPS, the Intrusion Prevention System, can be improved.Load balancing options and ability to manage a couple of Internet connections.Right now, you can postpone the update but eventually, if you don't do the update, it will install the updates automatically for you and that's something that is not working for me.The client-side VPN is weak. The product could be improved with deployment templates.The problem is that the two licenses do not currently integrate. We have to create separate companies and do an interconnection.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Watch out for hidden licensing and incredibly high annual maintenance costs.We paid about $7,000 for the Cisco firewall, plus another small Cisco router and the lead switch. It was under the combined license. It's a final agreement.The cost is a big factor for us. This is why we are using it only in our restricted area. They are very much higher than their competitors in the market.Licensing is expensive compared to other solutions.Pricing is high, but it is essentially a corporate decision.The cost is a bit high compared to other solutions in the market.Cisco recently has become very expensive.The cost is a bit higher than other competitive solutions on the market.

Read more »

The pricing for this solution is good.Setup cost may be not so low, as you expect, because it depends on different factors, but TCO for 5 years may pleasantly surprise you.Before choosing a piece of equipment you have to take into account the cost-benefit offered by each one. Sometimes it is not worth paying a very cheap price to have a minimum level of security.Each feature costs money, so it is important to study your needs.I would say that all things considered, the pricing is pretty good.Fortinet is reasonable in pricing and licensing. Overall, FortiGate is affordable. The licensing fee can be a little high, depending on the budget for your project.Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis.Compared to Palo Alto, which we have used in the past, pricing and licensing are okay.

Read more »

​Other content filtering solutions that I have used had more bells and whistles, but given the cost, complexity, and management overhead, I am very pleased with Meraki’s solution.Meraki is also expensive, but it's a little bit less expensive and it's easier to configure than Cisco ASA.Pricing varies as per the type of license.It is more expensive than other solutions, but it is a cloud-managed network solution and support is given at the moment you call. That give a very big plus.The Meraki UTM is excellent when you buy the Advanced Security license. If you buy a different license you lost all the valuable functions.It can always improve pricewise regarding throughput.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Answers from the Community
Miriam Tover
Donny McIverUser

Having experience with all 3 platforms, I lead with FortiGate almost every
time.

Here are some bullets on "why Fortinet"
- 340,000+ customers with 3.6+ million units shipped (more than any other security vendor)
- 90 of S&P Global 100
- 77 of Fortune 100
- 10 of the top 10 Fortune Telecom Companies
- 9 of the top 10 Fortune Retail and Commercial Banks
- 7 of the top 10 Aerospace and Defense
- High throughput: world's fastest firewall

Side by side comparison of 2 comparable models Fortigate 100E vs.
Meraki MX100:

Firewall: FG100E- 7.4 Gbps, Meraki- 750 Mbps

NGFW Throughput: FG100E- 360 Mbps, Meraki- Not published

Packets/second: FG100E- 6.6 Mpps, Meraki- Not Published

SSL Inspection Throughput: FG100E- 190 Mbps, Meraki- Not supported

IPSEC VPN: FG100E- 4 Gbps, Meraki- 500 Mbps

IPS: FG100E- 500 Mbps, Meraki- 750 Mbps

Connections (New/Max Sessions): FG100E- 30K / 2M, Meraki- 12K / 500K

Interfaces (I/O): FG100E- 20 Gbe / 2 SFP, Meraki- 10 Gbe / 2 SFP

5 Year Total Cost of Ownership: FG100E- $6.7K, Meraki- $15k

-FortiGate is a true NextGen Firewall (NGFW) – compared to Meraki, whose USP is “cloud-based ease of management.”
-FortiGate is locally managed, like traditional firewall + cloud management capable.
-A better Cisco product to compare against would be Cisco ASA-X series with FirePower Services (e.g. ASA-5545x or similar - $13k street price).

13 June 19
Rex MaguilaoUser

It’s my first-time using FortiGate and Meraki. I conducted POCs on both firewalls (Meraki and FortiGate) for a month, after which, I decided to acquire FortiGate.

FortiGate:
1- Takes three days for the configuration (from unboxing to network integration).
2- Has better performance than Meraki.
3- Security capabilities are mostly bundled.
4- Site to Site VPN can be easily integrated with other firewalls.
5- Affordable

Meraki:
1- Takes five days for the configuration (from unboxing to network integration).
2- Performance is good.
3- Security capabilities require additional purchase.
4- Additional instructions are needed for this feature for Site to Site VPN
5- High price.

11 February 19
Mike RobinsonUser

I have used Meraki Fortinet and Cisco. They all 3 have their own language. Cisco technicians want to use CLI, while Meraki will use either CLI or GUI, and Fortinet prefers GUI. Cisco at times can be hard to understand while Meraki is better 70% to understand and I have had nothing but success with Fortinet. As for price, I figured 3-year maintenance across the board Cisco was most expensive, Meraki 2nd, and Fortinet was least expensive. Fortinet seems to bundle more in that lower price also. As for a single view Meraki is top of the pile, with a firewall, switch and access point integration. Cisco and Fortinet will let devices run without maintenance. Meraki not so, the device gives a 30-day warning and then a hard stop, which can take a week to get back up and running!

11 February 19
Phillip PeermanReal User

Meraki equipment requires a current license in order to operate. This also gets you hardware replacement and tech support while the license is current. Fortigate requires a current license for advanced features and firmware upgrades only. This difference seems to put off some potential Meraki customers however, if you are planning on being connected to the Internet and not running current firmware on your security appliance bigger problems await you.

As for throughput you must size your solution to meet your needs based on Internet connectivity speed that plan to use for the life of the security appliance and the features you plan to use. If you have 250Mbps down and 25Mbps up today and plan to go 1 GB symmetrical within a year than you need to purchase a security appliance that can handle 1 GBps symmetrical now. Also advanced features like content filtering and IPS/IDS required extra horsepower on any manufacturers solution. VPN client software with Meraki would be nice but not having to pay for the AnyConnect licenses is a plus. I've heard users having issues with Meraki's Client VPN on Windows 10 but haven't experience this myself. The issues seem to be caused by Microsoft updates affected the VPN in Windows 10. Not exactly Meraki's fault but if Meraki didn't rely on MS for VPN connectivity software the issue would be null. I haven't done a VPN client solution with Fortigate to compare.

Fortigate has a CLI interface for advanced users that want that level of control.

I've used both solutions but find the dashboard for Meraki to be a huge plus. Also find it simpler to train new admins on as it is a 100% GUI solution. Either of these solutions (Fortigate or MX) are quite capable if you are looking for a security appliance. You can't go wrong with either choice in my opinion. If you have a complete Meraki stack (security, switch, APs, etc.) Meraki allows you to manage it all on the same dashboard.

@Matt Ellsworth - Meraki MX appliances allow outbound firewall rules. On the dashboard menu - Security and SD-WAN, Configure, Firewall, Outbound Rules. Fortigate has them also. I would say pretty much all enterprise firewalls have outbound rules.

11 February 19
Kristof VansteelandUser

In my opinion : Meraki has an end to end solution: firewall-switch-access point, that is not the deal with Fortinet.
The intent based networking solution avant la lettre has big quick wins.
As a managed service provider, we establish a powerful connection when having access to the dashboard , so customers are served in no time..
Fortinet is a good firewall like it is but has no advantage in this way.

The possibility to unlease cisco security with amp is again one eco system in connectivity and security.

Cisco has the largest amount of data … so intel is the biggest, more data= more knowledge.

Cisco has a name of being expensive, but with the right Cisco partner: htttps:\\www.conxion.be

and the right solution sales: kvansteeland@conxion.be

Cisco is the best kid in town !

12 February 19
MichaelThompsonUser

Having used a couple 60D for couple years and the Meraki for one engagement few things.

Meraki
Deployed the Meraki in a simple small network and it works great. Handful of of VLANs regular stuff.
I found Meraki support to not be at the same level of TAC
VPN - I personally opened 6-7 tickets, had another integrator and Cisco reseller take a crack at the VPN, we army another route. If VPN is not needed the box sets its up

60D - it worked, just bought 60E for another gig.

12 February 19
Eduardo PinaReal User

Management:
Meraki is based on cloud management.
Fortinet has local management (FortiGate + FortiManager), which guarantees a greater perception of security and control.

Additional:
Meraki has Umbrella available to supplement security on cloud.
Fortinet dont have a DNS add-on solution.

Wi-Fi:
Meraki Wi-Fi solutions have proven to be better than Fortinet.

Support:
Fortinet has a larger legacy than Meraki, and a greater number of specialists.
Meraki now has the structure of CISCO, even though they are different companies.

11 February 19
Jay RitterskampUser

Both companies have different revenue streams. What is good for one site might not work for another, and vise versa. I wouldn't recommend either one until I have an understanding of the needs at each site, or at least know what type of company I'm choosing a FW for. For instance, some smaller companies can go with an entirely different brand than Meraki or Fortigate...again, based on their needs. I have used both devices, and recommend different things for differing needs. A company that is entirely web based (no on-site server for instance) has differing needs than a site which has on-site services ONLY! IMHO, the question is too vague to answer completely. As an example, one of the biggest differences is the color of the chassis. The number of users supported also varies greatly, as do the services which are offered (or paid for) for each product. Based on your needs, there are models of firewalls available which have a MGMT location over LTE (which I find very attractive for some clients). If price isn't a concern, then I might have a different answer, but that answer is not implied in the question. Phillip, Matt, and Mustafa all have valid responses, but again, too little information is provided for a real answer.

11 February 19
Top Comparisons
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASAFortiGate 60b, FortiGate 60c, FortiGate 80c, FortiGate 50b, FortiGate 200b, FortiGate 110c, FortiGateMX64, MX64W, MX84, MX100, MX400, MX600
Learn
Cisco
Fortinet
Cisco
Overview

Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) is Cisco's end-to-end software solution and core operating system that powers the Cisco ASA product series. This software solution provides enterprise-level firewall capabilities for all types of ASA products, including blades, standalone appliances and virtual devices. Adaptive Security Appliance provides protection to organizations of all sizes, and allows end-users to access information securely anywhere, at any time, and through any device.

Adaptive Security Appliance is also fully compatible with other key security technologies, and so provides organizations with an all-encompassing security solution.

Block more threats and quickly mitigate those that do breach your defenses with the industry’s first threat-focused NGFW.

The FortiGate family of NG firewalls provides proven protection with unmatched performance across the network, from internal segments, to data centers, to cloud environments. FortiGates are available in a large range of sizes and form factors and are key components of the Fortinet Security Fabric, which enables immediate, intelligent defense against known and new threats throughout the entire network.

With the proliferation of modern applications and mixed-use networks, host and port based security is no longer sufficient. Cisco Meraki's layer 7 "next generation" firewall, included in MX security appliances and every wireless AP, gives administrators complete control over the users, content, and applications on their network.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco ASA NGFW
Learn more about Fortinet FortiGate
Learn more about Meraki MX Firewalls
Sample Customers
There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.Pittsburgh Steelers, LUSH Cosmetics, NASDAQ, Verizon, Arizona State University, Levi Strauss & Co. Whitepaper and case studies hereHyatt, ONS
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm18%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company12%
University7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company22%
Comms Service Provider14%
Manufacturing Company8%
Media Company8%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Real Estate/Law Firm9%
Healthcare Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company15%
Comms Service Provider12%
Cloud Provider10%
Media Company6%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider22%
Non Profit11%
Non Tech Company11%
Local Government11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider15%
Software R&D Company14%
Government12%
Manufacturing Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business37%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise37%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business40%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise35%
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise27%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business54%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise15%
REVIEWERS
Small Business55%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise23%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business55%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise32%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiGate vs. Meraki MX Firewalls and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email