We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Fudo PAM vs. NetIQ Privileged Account Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: October 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company.""We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX.""Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

More Fudo PAM Pros »

"Most valuable feature is the credential vault."

More NetIQ Privileged Account Manager Pros »

Cons
"The configuration is difficult.""The stability is not very good.""Professional training and certification would be great."

More Fudo PAM Cons »

"The user interface could be improved, it's not that good,"

More NetIQ Privileged Account Manager Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpoint… more »
Ranking
Views
1,332
Comparisons
817
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
464
Rating
8.0
Views
145
Comparisons
72
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
379
Rating
6.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Fudo Privileged Access Management
Micro Focus Privileged Account Manager
Learn More
Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

NetIQ Privileged Account Manager enables you to identify which identities have elevated access across your entire environment and what dependencies exist, giving you the insight you need to better simplify, implement, and manage policies around privilege.

Offer
Learn more about Fudo PAM
Learn more about NetIQ Privileged Account Manager
Sample Customers
KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider26%
Financial Services Firm10%
Educational Organization7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: October 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fudo PAM is ranked 7th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 3 reviews while NetIQ Privileged Account Manager is ranked 12th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review. Fudo PAM is rated 8.0, while NetIQ Privileged Account Manager is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Our research shows this is superior to competing products in some ways". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetIQ Privileged Account Manager writes "Has a useful credential vault feature but the user interface needs to be improved". Fudo PAM is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, WALLIX Bastion, One Identity Safeguard and Thycotic Secret Server, whereas NetIQ Privileged Account Manager is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.