We performed a comparison between Galvanize IncidentBond and IBM Resilient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."The customization and the transparency of data while still maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI, are key features. It allows for me, as an engineer, to evolve the individual components and modules, and to create a much more meaningful picture than the individual pieces in isolation ever could."
"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."
"The solution is easy to use."
"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."
"As a whole, the product is stable...Technical support is very good."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The initial setup of IBM Resilient is not that complex since my company already has a support license that we use internally. In general, the product's deployment phase is not that complex."
"IBM Resilient is scalable."
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."
"Stable – Release – Experimental" system with their releases, and all the proper checks and balances, I’d be an incredibly happy individual. I can appreciate the cause and affect, wherein the customization of the tool drives rapid release schedules, and the paradox that creates with the idea of stable releases. I’d also like more transparency about known bugs and issues."
"The product must provide more integration with other tools."
"There are shortcomings with IBM Resilient's technical support team that can be considered for improvement in the future."
"Its price needs improvement."
"The implementation could be a bit simpler."
"This product could be improved with better customization. This product isn't the best on the market like QRadar, but it's actually a good solution. However, some competitors' solutions contain more integration, support, automation, or flexibility."
"IBM Resilient is quite complex, including its configuration."
"The ability to analyze incidents needs to be improved in the solution."
"It is not very straightforward to set up custom integrations, especially with services like Azure. You need an additional server for integration."
Earn 20 points
Galvanize IncidentBond is ranked 11th in Security Incident Response while IBM Resilient is ranked 4th in Security Incident Response with 17 reviews. Galvanize IncidentBond is rated 9.0, while IBM Resilient is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Galvanize IncidentBond writes "Customization and transparency of data, while maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility ". Galvanize IncidentBond is most compared with , whereas IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR and IBM Cloud Pak for Security.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
