Andrei BigdanAssistant at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Arun SubramaniamCyber Security Engineer at quadra
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."
"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."
"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too."
"The features I like most about this solution is the endpoint modules because it gives us the protection we need."
"I'm able to track everyone who is trying to send information outside the environment and to know if they are not supposed to be sending it. I'm also able to see the people who are accessing or maybe try to access the information they are not supposed to be accessing based on their level of classification. It gives me overall control of who has got access to what and at what point. And who can do what with specific information."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is endpoint security."
"The data matching features are the most valuable due to the easy policy setup and implementation."
"We find the product is easy to manage and maintain."
"We work in the banking field. We deploy data loss prevention. Our branch protects our clients' data, credit card numbers, account numbers, and other confidential and sensitive data."
"The dashboard, management section, and reporting are good."
"The dashboard, management section, and reporting are good."
"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."
"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."
"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."
"I do have a problem with the database."
"In a majority of cases, most of the companies are using DLP for endpoint sessions, where you have a user that might be communicating information outside of the company. However, they forget there are actual interfaces that can directly communicate with either the database or other files within the data center that uses end-to-end encryption. In those cases, you might need things like your DLP to be able to monitor and block some of that. The solution needs to catch information communicated through the data center on the server-side."
"This product is very powerful but it is very complex, so making it simpler to use would be an improvement."
"The enforce service is difficult to understand, and free courses made available on the internet would be useful."
"We're not sure if there was an issue or a bug on the system recently because as of right now if someone sends out a compressed encrypted file, the DLP won't scan it."
"I would like for the administrator management interface to improve. It's kind of old and slow. Updating it would make this solution better."
"There are some features that are not available which are required by every data loss prevention solution."
"It is very difficult to log in to create a support ticket because no one is available to support our queries."
"Its price is very reasonable and competitive."
"They offer a lot of features in a single bundle. So, if you want to remove some features from GTB, you can remove those. You don't need to buy those, and the price will reduce accordingly. I am very happy with the pricing."
"Pricing is reasonable."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The price is competitive."
Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:
• Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems
• Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network
• Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used
GTB Technologies Inspector is ranked 7th in Data Loss Prevention with 3 reviews while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is ranked 1st in Data Loss Prevention with 11 reviews. GTB Technologies Inspector is rated 9.0, while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of GTB Technologies Inspector writes "Helps to develop business processes and has the ability to test on its own ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Data Loss Prevention writes "Great technical support, good features, and scales well". GTB Technologies Inspector is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian, whereas Symantec Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Microsoft Endpoint DLP and McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. See our GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.