• Home
  • Hitachi uCosminexus [EOL] vs. Mule ESB

Hitachi uCosminexus [EOL] vs Mule ESB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hitachi Vantara Logo

Hitachi uCosminexus [EOL]

views| comparisons
MuleSoft Logo

Mule ESB

Read 45 Mule ESB reviews
7,174 views|5,877 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Server
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi uCosminexus [EOL] and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Apache, Red Hat and others in Application Server.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Server Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Hitachi uCosminexus [EOL]?
Jose-Ramirez
Modernized the way my company offers services and improved the user experience
The solution improved the company by modernizing the way they offer services and improving the user experience.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "This is expensive. In my next project, we had to go to other vendor."
  • "Plan your licensing model (cloud or on-premises or hybrid) that will allow seamless integration with new partners."
  • "The various features and components for this solution are no longer free."
  • "The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."
  • "This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."
  • "Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."
  • "This product is expensive, but it does offer value for money."
  • "I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense."

    • More Mule ESB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise...
    Top Answer:I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF on… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?
    Top Answer:Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integration… more »
    What do you like most about Mule ESB?
    Top Answer:The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
    Read all 32 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Server
    2nd
    out of 23 in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
    Views
    7,174
    Comparisons
    5,877
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    377
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    uCosminexus
    Learn More
    Hitachi Vantara
    MuleSoft
    Overview

    Hitachi uCosminexus is a reliable and high-performance Web application server that is compliant with Java EE.

    For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.
    Sample Customers
    Sybase, Cessna, Eastern Illinois University, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), The American Museum of Natural History
    Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company46%
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Server
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Apache, Red Hat and others in Application Server. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hitachi uCosminexus [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Server while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. Hitachi uCosminexus [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". Hitachi uCosminexus [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and Red Hat Fuse.

    We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.